O2 Cocoon vs Philips S7221
O2 Cocoon vs Philips S7221 — full specifications compared side by side. The O2 Cocoon launched in 2007; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Philips S7221 gives you the larger screen — 6.7 inches against 2.3 inches.
O2 Cocoon: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Philips S7221
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | O2 Cocoon | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 2.28″ · LCD (other) | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | — | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 2GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Philips S7221 takes 1 of the 2 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7221 gives you the larger screen — 6.7 inches against 2.3 inches.
- O2 Cocoon is the lighter phone — 114 g against 210 g.
Category scores
| Category | O2 Cocoon | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4.6 | 5.5Better |
| Audio | 6.5Tie | 6.8Tie |
| Performance | — | 3.7 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Battery | — | 7.4 |
| Software | — | 6.0 |
| Call Quality | — | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
O2 Cocoon
- Lighter body (114 g vs 210 g)
Philips S7221
- More storage (256 GB vs 2 GB)
- Larger display (6.67″ vs 2.28″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | O2 Cocoon | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Discontinued | Available |
| Announced date | Jun 2007 | — |
| Release date | — | 2026 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 2 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 2.28″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 240 × 320 pixels | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | LCD (other) | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Philips S7221 wins narrowly on Display (4.6 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Removable battery | Yes | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 25W |
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 94 × 49 × 21 mm | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | 114 g | 210 g |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | None | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2 | — |
| USB | 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| NFC | — | No |
| Positioning | — | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 2 MP | 16 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| OS | — | Android |
| OS version | — | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | — | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | — | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 2 MP, AF | 16 MP |
| Connectivity · Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for O2 Cocoon
- O2 Cocoon vs Philips S7210Better for Display
- O2 Cocoon vs Philips S7221Better for Display
- O2 Cocoon vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Display
- O2 Cocoon vs Samsung Galaxy A58
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72215.7Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72215.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display