vivo V80 FE vs Philips S7221
vivo V80 FE wins clearly over Philips S7221 — 6.9 overall against 5.7. vivo V80 FE has the bigger battery — 7,000 mAh against 5,700 mAh.
vivo V80 FE: Based on announced specs — scored in 8 categories.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner

vivo V80 FE
6.9/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | vivo V80 FE | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Turbo (4 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.59″ · OLED · 120 Hz | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56") | 64 MP |
| Battery | 7,000 mAh · 90W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 8GB / 256GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- vivo V80 FE wins clearly over Philips S7221 — 6.9 overall against 5.7.
- vivo V80 FE takes 4 of the 7 categories both phones are scored in.
- vivo V80 FE has the bigger battery — 7,000 mAh against 5,700 mAh.
- On paper, Philips S7221 has the higher-resolution main camera — 64 MP against 50 MP.
- vivo V80 FE charges faster — 90W wired against 25W.
Category scores
| Category | vivo V80 FE | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6.1Better | 3.7 |
| Camera | 6.5Better | 5.9 |
| Display | 8.0Better | 5.5 |
| Battery | 8.8Better | 7.4 |
| Design & Build | 6.2 | — |
| Software | 6.0Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.9Tie | 6.8Tie |
| Call Quality | 6.2Tie | 6.2Tie |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
vivo V80 FE
- Faster charging (90W vs 25W)
- Bigger battery (7,000 mAh vs 5,700 mAh)
- Lighter body (201 g vs 210 g)
Philips S7221
- Higher-resolution main camera (64 MP vs 50 MP)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | vivo V80 FE | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Announced | Available |
| Expected release window | 3 Nov 2026 | — |
| Release date | — | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 17, OriginOS 7 | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Turbo (4 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Performance (6.1 vs 3.7) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Card slot | None | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.59″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 1,260 × 2,750 pixels | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | 3,000 nits | — |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Display (8.0 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 90W | 25W |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Battery (8.8 vs 7.4) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 157.8 × 74.5 × 7.8 mm | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | 201 g | 210 g |
| Materials | Glass, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Chill Green, Sparkling Gold | Black, Blue, Gray |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass | — |
| Fingerprint | Optical (under-display) | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56") · 50 MP ultrawide (f/2.1) | 64 MP |
| Front cameras | 50 MP wide (f/2) | 16 MP |
| Video (max) | 4K | Yes |
| vivo V80 FE wins narrowly on Camera (6.5 vs 5.9) | ||
| Additional specifications | ||
| Network · Bands 2g | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| Network · Bands 3g | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| Network · Bands 4g | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 25, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Network · Bands 5g | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Network · Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Main Camera · Features | Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Main Camera · Video | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS | Yes |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF | 16 MP |
| Selfie Camera · Video | 4K, 1080p | Yes |
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for vivo V80 FE
- vivo V80 FE vs Philips S7210Overall scorevivo V80 FE6.9Philips S72105.9
- vivo V80 FE vs Philips S7221Overall scorevivo V80 FE6.9Philips S72215.7
- vivo V80 FE vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- vivo V80 FE vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72215.7Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72215.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display
