O2 Cocoon vs Philips S7210
O2 Cocoon vs Philips S7210 — full specifications compared side by side. The O2 Cocoon launched in 2007; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 2.3 inches.
O2 Cocoon: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Philips S7210
5.9/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | O2 Cocoon | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 2.28″ · LCD (other) | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | — | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | 2GB | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Category by category it is split — 1 scored categories each, with 0 tied.
- Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 2.3 inches.
- O2 Cocoon is the lighter phone — 114 g against 203 g.
Category scores
| Category | O2 Cocoon | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4.6 | 5.2Better |
| Audio | 6.5Better | 5.4 |
| Performance | — | 4.6 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Battery | — | 8.2 |
| Software | — | 6.0 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
O2 Cocoon
- Lighter body (114 g vs 203 g)
Philips S7210
- More storage (128 GB vs 2 GB)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 2.28″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | O2 Cocoon | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Discontinued | Available |
| Announced date | Jun 2007 | — |
| Release date | — | Jun 2026 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 2 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 2.28″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 240 × 320 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | LCD (other) | IPS LCD |
| Philips S7210 wins narrowly on Display (4.6 vs 5.2) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Removable battery | Yes | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,700 mAh |
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 94 × 49 × 21 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 114 g | 203 g |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Colours | — | Black, Titan |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | None | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2 | — |
| USB | 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| NFC | — | No |
| Positioning | — | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| OS | — | Android |
| OS version | — | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | — | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | — | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 2 MP, AF | 8 MP |
| Connectivity · Radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for O2 Cocoon
- O2 Cocoon vs Philips S7210Better for Display
- O2 Cocoon vs Philips S7221Better for Display
- O2 Cocoon vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Display
- O2 Cocoon vs Samsung Galaxy A58
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72105.9Philips S72215.7
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Philips S7210 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72105.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display