Samsung Galaxy F02s vs Coolpad Cool X Wide
Samsung Galaxy F02s vs Coolpad Cool X Wide is too close to call — 6.2 overall against 6.1. The Samsung Galaxy F02s launched in 2021; the Coolpad Cool X Wide in 2026. Coolpad Cool X Wide charges faster — 18W wired against 15W.
Samsung Galaxy F02s: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Coolpad Cool X Wide: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Samsung Galaxy F02s
6.2/ 10 — Average
$120≈ €107 · ≈ £90≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Coolpad Cool X Wide
6.1/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung Galaxy F02s | Coolpad Cool X Wide |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (14nm) | MediaTek Helio G99 (4G) |
| Display | 6.5″ · LCD (other) | 6.38″ · 90 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh · 15W charging | 18W charging |
| RAM / Storage | — | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy F02s vs Coolpad Cool X Wide is too close to call — 6.2 overall against 6.1.
- Samsung Galaxy F02s takes 2 of the 2 categories both phones are scored in.
- Coolpad Cool X Wide charges faster — 18W wired against 15W.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung Galaxy F02s | Coolpad Cool X Wide |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.2Better | 3.4 |
| Battery | 6.9 | — |
| Software | 6.6Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 6.5 | — |
| Performance | — | 8.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung Galaxy F02s
- Larger display (6.5″ vs 6.38″)
Coolpad Cool X Wide
- Faster charging (18W vs 15W)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F02s | Coolpad Cool X Wide |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2021 | 8 Nov 2026 |
| Announced date | — | 20 Oct 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 with One UI Core 3.1 | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (14nm) | MediaTek Helio G99 (4G) |
| CPU | Octa-core (8x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | — |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.5″ | 6.38″ |
| Resolution | 720 × 1,600 pixels | 720 × 1,158 pixels |
| Panel type | LCD (other) | — |
| Display protection | Not Specified | — |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Samsung Galaxy F02s wins clearly on Display (5.2 vs 3.4) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 15W | 18W |
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 164.2 × 75.9 × 9.1 mm | 150.3 × 94.5 × 8.95 mm |
| Colours | Diamond Black, Diamond Blue, Diamond White | Glazed White, Rock Black, Crimson |
| Weight | — | 209 g |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity | — |
| Face unlock | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 5 MP (f/2.2) | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB · 12 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
Popular comparisons for Samsung Galaxy F02s
- Samsung Galaxy F02s vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy F02s6.2Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1
- Samsung Galaxy F02s vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy F02s6.2vivo Y6k5.5Better for Display
- Samsung Galaxy F02s vs Philips S7210Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy F02s6.2Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy F02s vs Philips S7221Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy F02s6.2Philips S72216.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Coolpad Cool X Wide
- Coolpad Cool X Wide vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreCoolpad Cool X Wide6.1vivo Y6k5.5Better for Display
- Coolpad Cool X Wide vs Philips S7210Overall scoreCoolpad Cool X Wide6.1Philips S72106.5Better for Display
- Coolpad Cool X Wide vs Philips S7221Overall scoreCoolpad Cool X Wide6.1Philips S72216.6Better for Display
- Coolpad Cool X Wide vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreCoolpad Cool X Wide6.1RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro7.5Better for Display