Philips S7210 vs Coolpad Cool X Wide

Philips S7210 wins clearly over Coolpad Cool X Wide — 6.5 overall against 5.3. Both launched in 2026. Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 6.4 inches.

Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.

Coolpad Cool X Wide: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.

Overall winner

Philips S7210

Philips · Phone

6.5/ 10 — Average

Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk

Full specs & details

Coolpad Cool X Wide

Coolpad · Phone

5.3/ 10 — Below average

Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk

Full specs & details

Key highlights

Highlight	Philips S7210	Coolpad Cool X Wide
Processor	Unisoc T765 (6 nm)	MediaTek Helio G99 (4G)
Display	6.75″ · IPS LCD	6.38″ · 90 Hz
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Battery	5,700 mAh	18W charging
RAM / Storage	4GB / 128GB	8GB / 256GB

Which is better?

Philips S7210 wins clearly over Coolpad Cool X Wide — 6.5 overall against 5.3.
Philips S7210 takes 2 of the 5 categories both phones are scored in.
Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 6.4 inches.
Philips S7210 is the lighter phone — 203 g against 209 g.

Category scores

Category	Philips S7210	Coolpad Cool X Wide
Performance	7.0Better	5.3
Camera	5.7Tie	5.7Tie
Display	5.2Better	3.4
Battery	9.0	—
Software	6.0Tie	6.0Tie
Audio	4.6	—
Call Quality	7.8Tie	7.8Tie

Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.

Reasons to consider

Philips S7210

Larger display (6.75″ vs 6.38″)
Lighter body (203 g vs 209 g)

Coolpad Cool X Wide

More storage (256 GB vs 128 GB)
More RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB)

Full specifications side by side

Specification	Philips S7210	Coolpad Cool X Wide
Launch
Launch status	Available	Available
Release date	Jun 2026	8 Nov 2026
Announced date	—	20 Oct 2026
Platform
OS	Android	Android
OS version	Android 16	Android 16
Chipset (as published)	Unisoc T765 (6 nm)	MediaTek Helio G99 (4G)
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55)	—
GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	—
Philips S7210 wins clearly on Performance (7.0 vs 5.3)
Memory
Memory variants (RAM/storage)	4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB	8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB · 12 GB RAM + 256 GB
Display
Display size	6.75″	6.38″
Resolution	720 × 1,612 pixels	720 × 1,158 pixels
Panel type	IPS LCD	—
Refresh rate	—	90 Hz
Philips S7210 wins clearly on Display (5.2 vs 3.4)
Battery
Battery capacity	5,700 mAh	—
Wired charging	—	18W
Body & build
Dimensions	168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm	150.3 × 94.5 × 8.95 mm
Weight	203 g	209 g
Colours	Black, Titan	Glazed White, Rock Black, Crimson
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	—
Connectivity
NFC	No	—
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	—
Positioning	GPS	—
Audio
3.5mm jack	No	—
Features
Fingerprint	Side-mounted	Side-mounted
Network
Network technologies	2G, 3G, 4G, 5G	2G, 3G, 4G, 5G
Camera
Rear cameras	50 MP	50 MP
Front cameras	8 MP	8 MP
Video (max)	Yes	—
Additional specifications
Selfie Camera · Single	8 MP	8 MP
Misc · Price	About 150 EUR	CNY 999 (China, 8GB + 128GB)

Popular comparisons for Philips S7210

Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72106.5Philips S72216.6
Philips S7210 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Coolpad Cool X Wide5.3
Philips S7210 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72106.5vivo Y6k5.1
Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72106.5RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro7.5Better for Display

Popular comparisons for Coolpad Cool X Wide

Coolpad Cool X Wide vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreCoolpad Cool X Wide5.3vivo Y6k5.1Better for Display
Coolpad Cool X Wide vs Philips S7210Overall scoreCoolpad Cool X Wide5.3Philips S72106.5Better for Display
Coolpad Cool X Wide vs Philips S7221Overall scoreCoolpad Cool X Wide5.3Philips S72216.6Better for Display
Coolpad Cool X Wide vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreCoolpad Cool X Wide5.3RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro7.5Better for Display