Samsung Galaxy F02s vs vivo Y6k
Samsung Galaxy F02s wins narrowly over vivo Y6k — 6.2 overall against 5.5. The Samsung Galaxy F02s launched in 2021; the vivo Y6k in 2026. vivo Y6k gives you the larger screen — 6.7 inches against 6.5 inches.
Samsung Galaxy F02s: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
vivo Y6k: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner
Samsung Galaxy F02s
6.2/ 10 — Average
$120≈ €107 · ≈ £90≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
vivo Y6k
5.5/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung Galaxy F02s | vivo Y6k |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (14nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (octa-core, up to 2.4 GHz) |
| Display | 6.5″ · LCD (other) | 6.74″ · LCD (other) · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 13 MP (f/2.2) |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh · 15W charging | 15W charging |
| RAM / Storage | — | 6GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy F02s wins narrowly over vivo Y6k — 6.2 overall against 5.5.
- Category by category it is split — 1 scored categories each, with 0 tied.
- vivo Y6k gives you the larger screen — 6.7 inches against 6.5 inches.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung Galaxy F02s | vivo Y6k |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.2 | 5.9Better |
| Battery | 6.9 | — |
| Software | 6.6Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 6.5 | — |
| Performance | — | 5.5 |
| Camera | — | 4.0 |
| Design & Build | — | 6.4 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
vivo Y6k
- Larger display (6.74″ vs 6.5″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F02s | vivo Y6k |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2021 | Nov 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 with One UI Core 3.1 | Android 16, OriginOS 6 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (14nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 (octa-core, up to 2.4 GHz) |
| CPU | Octa-core (8x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | — |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Mali-G57 |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.5″ | 6.74″ |
| Resolution | 720 × 1,600 pixels | 1,600 × 720 pixels |
| Panel type | LCD (other) | LCD (other) |
| Display protection | Not Specified | — |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1,200 nits |
| vivo Y6k wins narrowly on Display (5.2 vs 5.9) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 15W | 15W |
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 164.2 × 75.9 × 9.1 mm | 167.4 × 77.1 × 8.39 mm |
| Colours | Diamond Black, Diamond Blue, Diamond White | Blue, White, Black |
| Weight | — | 209 g |
| IP rating | — | IP65 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity | — |
| Face unlock | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 5 MP (f/2.2) | 5 MP (f/2.2) |
| Rear cameras | — | 13 MP (f/2.2) |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 6 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Misc · Models | SM-E025F, SM-E025F/DS | V2542A |
Popular comparisons for Samsung Galaxy F02s
- Samsung Galaxy F02s vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy F02s6.2Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1
- Samsung Galaxy F02s vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy F02s6.2vivo Y6k5.5Better for Display
- Samsung Galaxy F02s vs Philips S7210Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy F02s6.2Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy F02s vs Philips S7221Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy F02s6.2Philips S72216.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for vivo Y6k
- vivo Y6k vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorevivo Y6k5.5Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1Better for Gaming
- vivo Y6k vs Philips S7210Overall scorevivo Y6k5.5Philips S72106.5Better for Cameras
- vivo Y6k vs Philips S7221Overall scorevivo Y6k5.5Philips S72216.6Better for Cameras
- vivo Y6k vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorevivo Y6k5.5RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro7.5Better for Cameras