ZTE Axon 9 Pro vs Philips S7210
Philips S7210 wins narrowly over ZTE Axon 9 Pro — 6.5 overall against 5.8. The ZTE Axon 9 Pro launched in 2018; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,000 mAh.
ZTE Axon 9 Pro: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.

ZTE Axon 9 Pro
5.8/ 10 — Below average
≈ $728€650 · ≈ £542≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsOverall winner

Philips S7210
6.5/ 10 — Average
≈ $168€150 · ≈ £125≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | ZTE Axon 9 Pro | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.21″ · OLED | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 4,000 mAh · 18W charging | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | 6GB / 128GB | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Philips S7210 wins narrowly over ZTE Axon 9 Pro — 6.5 overall against 5.8.
- Category by category it is split — 2 scored categories each, with 1 tied.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,000 mAh.
- Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 6.2 inches.
- ZTE Axon 9 Pro is the lighter phone — 179 g against 203 g.
Category scores
| Category | ZTE Axon 9 Pro | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4.3 | 7.0Better |
| Display | 7.4Better | 5.2 |
| Battery | 6.0 | 9.0Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.8Better | 4.6 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
- Lighter body (179 g vs 203 g)
Philips S7210
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh)
- More RAM (8 GB vs 6 GB)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 6.21″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | ZTE Axon 9 Pro | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | Nov 2018 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.65 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.76 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 630 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Performance (4.3 vs 7.0) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 6 GB RAM + 128 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Card slot | Shared / hybrid slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.21″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,248 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| ZTE Axon 9 Pro wins clearly on Display (7.4 vs 5.2) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 18W | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (6.0 vs 9.0) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 156.5 × 74.5 × 7.9 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 203 g |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Colours | — | Black, Titan |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | Stereo | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 20 MP wide (f/2) | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.0m | 8 MP |
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for ZTE Axon 9 Pro
- ZTE Axon 9 Pro vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scoreZTE Axon 9 Pro5.8Infinix Smart 20e5.3Better for Battery life
- ZTE Axon 9 Pro vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreZTE Axon 9 Pro5.8Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1Better for Gaming
- ZTE Axon 9 Pro vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreZTE Axon 9 Pro5.8vivo Y6k5.5Better for Gaming
- ZTE Axon 9 Pro vs Philips S7210Overall scoreZTE Axon 9 Pro5.8Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72106.5Philips S72216.6
- Philips S7210 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- Philips S7210 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72106.5vivo Y6k5.5Better for Display
