Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 vs Erazer U126
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 vs Erazer U126 — full specifications compared side by side. Erazer U126 charges faster — 65W wired against 33W.
One of these devices is still rumored — its specs are not official yet and may change before launch.
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3: Based on announced specs — scored in 3 categories.
Erazer U126: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Erazer U126
6.2/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 | Erazer U126 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Intel Core Ultra 5 115U (8 cores, 10 threads) |
| Display | — | 12.6″ · OLED · 60 Hz |
| Battery | 10,000 mAh · 33W charging | 65W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 8GB / 256GB | 1TB |
Which is better?
- Category by category it is split — 1 scored categories each, with 0 tied.
- Erazer U126 charges faster — 65W wired against 33W.
Category scores
| Category | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 | Erazer U126 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4.5 | 6.6Better |
| Battery | 8.4 | — |
| Call Quality | 6.2Better | 4.2 |
| Display | — | 6.4 |
| Software | — | 6.2 |
| Audio | — | 5.5 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Erazer U126
- More storage (1 TB vs 256 GB)
- Faster charging (65W vs 33W)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 | Erazer U126 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Rumored | Available |
| Release date | — | Nov 2026 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB | 512 GB · 1 TB · 8 GB · 12 GB · 16 GB |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 33W | 65W |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 4G | — |
| Platform | ||
| OS | — | Android |
| OS version | — | Windows 11 and Android 16 (dual operating systems with advertised seamless switching) |
| Chipset (as published) | — | Intel Core Ultra 5 115U (8 cores, 10 threads) |
| GPU | — | Intel integrated graphics; Intel AI Boost NPU |
| Erazer U126 wins clearly on Performance (4.5 vs 6.6) | ||
| Display | ||
| Display size | — | 12.6″ |
| Resolution | — | 2,560 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | — | OLED |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 450 nits |
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | — | 286.13 × 184.29 × 8.5 mm |
| Weight | — | 760 g |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5 |
| USB | — | USB Type-C (external display output and peripherals) |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | — | 5 MP |
Popular comparisons for Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3
- Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 vs Erazer U126Better for Gaming
- Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 vs Alldocube iPlay 80 mini
- Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 vs Blackview Mega 12Better for Gaming
- Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 vs TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaperBetter for Gaming
Popular comparisons for Erazer U126
- Erazer U126 vs Blackview Mega 12Overall scoreErazer U1266.2Blackview Mega 126.5
- Erazer U126 vs TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaperOverall scoreErazer U1266.2TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper5.8
- Erazer U126 vs TCL Tab A1 PlusOverall scoreErazer U1266.2TCL Tab A1 Plus5.7
- Erazer U126 vs TCL Tab A1Overall scoreErazer U1266.2TCL Tab A16