TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3
TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 — full specifications compared side by side.
One of these devices is still rumored — its specs are not official yet and may change before launch.
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3: Based on announced specs — scored in 3 categories.
TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper
5.8/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | — |
| Display | 12.2″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz | — |
| Main camera | 8 MP wide (f/2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) | — |
| Battery | 10,000 mAh · 33W charging | 10,000 mAh · 33W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 6GB / 256GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Category by category it is split — 1 scored categories each, with 0 tied.
Category scores
| Category | TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4.9Better | 4.5 |
| Camera | 3.5 | — |
| Display | 5.8 | — |
| Battery | 7.9 | 8.4Better |
| Design & Build | 7.2 | — |
| Software | 6.0 | — |
| Audio | 6.8 | — |
| Call Quality | — | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3
- More RAM (8 GB vs 6 GB)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper | Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Rumored |
| Release date | 3 Aug 2026 | — |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | — |
| OS version | Android 16, planned upgrade to Android 17 | — |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | — |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | — |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | — |
| TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper wins narrowly on Performance (4.9 vs 4.5) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 6 GB RAM + 256 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 12.2″ | — |
| Resolution | 2,400 × 1,600 pixels | — |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | — |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 10,000 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33W | 33W |
| Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 wins narrowly on Battery (7.9 vs 8.4) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 275.6 × 189.3 × 6.7 mm | — |
| Weight | 556 g | — |
| Materials | Glass, Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Aerolite Grey | — |
| SIM | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 | — |
| NFC | No | — |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | Stereo | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity | — |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 8 MP wide (f/2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) | — |
| Front cameras | 8 MP | — |
| Video (max) | 1080p@30fps | — |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 4G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Misc · Models | 9445X | 26104RPF2G, 2610FRP38G |
Popular comparisons for TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper
- TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper vs TCL Tab A1 PlusOverall scoreTCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper5.8TCL Tab A1 Plus5.7
- TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper vs TCL Tab A1Overall scoreTCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper5.8TCL Tab A16
- TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper vs TCL Tab A1 NxtPaperOverall scoreTCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper5.8TCL Tab A1 NxtPaper6.3Better for Battery life
- TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper vs Erazer U126Overall scoreTCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper5.8Erazer U1266.2Better for Gaming
Popular comparisons for Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3
- Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 vs Erazer U126Better for Gaming
- Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 vs Alldocube iPlay 80 mini
- Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 vs Blackview Mega 12Better for Gaming
- Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3 vs TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaperBetter for Gaming