Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro vs Philips S7221
Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro wins clearly over Philips S7221 — 7.1 overall against 5.7. Both launched in 2026. Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 5,500 mAh.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner

Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro
7.1/ 10 — Good
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.67″ · OLED · 120 Hz | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | 50 MP wide (f/1.5, OIS, 1/1.96", 0.8µm) | 64 MP |
| Battery | 5,500 mAh · 45W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 12GB / 256GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro wins clearly over Philips S7221 — 7.1 overall against 5.7.
- Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro takes 5 of the 7 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 5,500 mAh.
- On paper, Philips S7221 has the higher-resolution main camera — 64 MP against 50 MP.
- Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro charges faster — 45W wired against 25W.
Category scores
| Category | Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6.2Better | 3.7 |
| Camera | 6.4Better | 5.9 |
| Display | 8.4Better | 5.5 |
| Battery | 7.9Better | 7.4 |
| Design & Build | 7.5 | — |
| Software | 6.3Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.9Tie | 6.8Tie |
| Call Quality | 7.8Better | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro
- Faster charging (45W vs 25W)
- More RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB)
- Lighter body (190 g vs 210 g)
Philips S7221
- Higher-resolution main camera (64 MP vs 50 MP)
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 5,500 mAh)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2 Nov 2026 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 16 |
| Chipset | Dimensity 7300 Ultra | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro wins clearly on Performance (6.2 vs 3.7) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 12 GB RAM + 256 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Card slot | None | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.67″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 1,220 × 2,712 pixels | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | 3,000 nits | — |
| Display protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| PWM dimming rate | 1,920 Hz | — |
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro wins clearly on Display (8.4 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,500 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W | 25W |
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro wins narrowly on Battery (7.9 vs 7.4) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 162.3 × 74.4 × 8.2 mm | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 210 g |
| Materials | Glass, Plastic, Vegan leather | — |
| IP rating | IP68 | — |
| Colours | Titan Black, Phantom Purple, Spectre Blue, White | Black, Blue, Gray |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Bluetooth codecs | LHDC 5, ASHA | — |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass | — |
| Fingerprint | Optical (under-display) | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 50 MP wide (f/1.5, OIS, 1/1.96", 0.8µm) · 8 MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) · 2 MP macro | 64 MP |
| Front cameras | 20 MP wide (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 0.7µm) | 16 MP |
| Video (max) | 4K@24/30fps | Yes |
| Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro wins narrowly on Camera (6.4 vs 5.9) | ||
| Additional specifications | ||
| Network · Bands 2g | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| Network · Bands 3g | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| Network · Bands 4g | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Network · Bands 5g | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Network · Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Main Camera · Video | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | Yes |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 16 MP |
| Selfie Camera · Video | 1080p@30/60fps | Yes |
| Connectivity · Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| Misc · Price | About 300 EUR | ₹ 19,499 |
Popular comparisons for Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro
- Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro vs Philips S7210Overall scoreXiaomi Redmi M100 Pro7.1Philips S72105.9
- Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro vs Philips S7221Overall scoreXiaomi Redmi M100 Pro7.1Philips S72215.7
- Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreXiaomi Redmi M100 Pro7.1RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Battery life
- Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreXiaomi Redmi M100 Pro7.1ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72215.7Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72215.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display
