Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 vs Philips S7221
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 vs Philips S7221 — full specifications compared side by side. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 launched in 2020; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 gives you the larger screen — 169.4 inches against 6.7 inches.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0
$599≈ €532 · ≈ £444≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G SM8250 (Kona), 2020, 64 bit, octa-core, 32 Kbyte I-Cache, 32 Kbyte D-Cache, 2304 Kbyte L2, 4096 Kbyte L3, 7 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 650 GPU | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 169.4″ · OLED | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | 65W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 128GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Category by category it is split — 0 scored categories each, with 2 tied.
- Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 gives you the larger screen — 169.4 inches against 6.7 inches.
- Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 charges faster — 65W wired against 25W.
- Philips S7221 is the lighter phone — 210 g against 222 g.
Category scores
| Category | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.8Tie | 5.5Tie |
| Software | 6.0Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Performance | — | 3.7 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Battery | — | 7.4 |
| Audio | — | 6.8 |
| Call Quality | — | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0
- Larger display (169.4″ vs 6.67″)
- Faster charging (65W vs 25W)
Philips S7221
- More storage (256 GB vs 128 GB)
- Lighter body (210 g vs 222 g)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2020 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Google Android 10 (Q) | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G SM8250 (Kona), 2020, 64 bit, octa-core, 32 Kbyte I-Cache, 32 Kbyte D-Cache, 2304 Kbyte L2, 4096 Kbyte L3, 7 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 650 GPU | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | 2840.0 MHz | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 128 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Card slot | None | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 169.4″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,400 pixels | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Display protection | Gorilla Glass 6 | — |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Wired charging | 65W | 25W |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,700 mAh |
| Body & build | ||
| Weight | 222 g | 210 g |
| Dimensions | — | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue, Gray |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 | — |
| USB | USB C reversible; USB charging , USB fast charging , USB Host , USB OTG 1.3 , USB OTG 2.0 , USB PD , USB PD 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| NFC | — | No |
| Positioning | — | GPS |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 19.9 MP | 16 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | EIS (video) , Pixel unification , HDR photo , HDR video , Red-eye reduction , Slow motion video , Burst mode , Refocus , Touch focus , Macro mode , Panorama Photo , Face detection , Face tagging , Smile detection , Face retouch , Face retouch (video) , Intelligent scene detection | LED flash |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 19.9 MP | 16 MP |
Popular comparisons for Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0
- Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 vs Philips S7210
- Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 vs Philips S7221
- Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Display
- Xiaomi Black Shark 3 5G Standard Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE 128GB KLE-H0 vs Samsung Galaxy A58
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72215.7Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72215.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display