Teclast M60 vs Alldocube iPlay 80 mini
Teclast M60 vs Alldocube iPlay 80 mini — full specifications compared side by side. Both launched in 2026. Teclast M60 has the bigger battery — 8,000 mAh against 5,850 mAh.
Teclast M60: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Alldocube iPlay 80 mini: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Teclast M60
6.2/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & details
Key highlights
| Highlight | Teclast M60 | Alldocube iPlay 80 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T7250 (octa-core) | Unisoc T610 (2x Cortex-A75 + 6x Cortex-A55, up to 1.8 GHz) |
| Display | 11.97″ · IPS LCD · 90 Hz | 8.68″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Battery | 8,000 mAh | 5,850 mAh · 18W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 6GB / 128GB | 4GB / 64GB |
Which is better?
- Teclast M60 takes 1 of the 2 categories both tablets are scored in.
- Teclast M60 has the bigger battery — 8,000 mAh against 5,850 mAh.
- Teclast M60 gives you the larger screen — 12.0 inches against 8.7 inches.
- On paper, Teclast M60 has the higher-resolution main camera — 13 MP against 5 MP.
Category scores
| Category | Teclast M60 | Alldocube iPlay 80 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5.5 | — |
| Camera | 4.0 | — |
| Display | 5.7 | — |
| Battery | 9.6Better | 7.7 |
| Software | 6.0 | — |
| Audio | 7.1 | — |
| Call Quality | 6.2Tie | 6.2Tie |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Teclast M60
- Higher-resolution main camera (13 MP vs 5 MP)
- More storage (128 GB vs 64 GB)
- More RAM (6 GB vs 4 GB)
- Larger display (11.97″ vs 8.68″)
Alldocube iPlay 80 mini
- Lighter body (350 g vs 600 g)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Teclast M60 | Alldocube iPlay 80 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | Oct 2026 | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Unisoc T7250 (octa-core) | Unisoc T610 (2x Cortex-A75 + 6x Cortex-A55, up to 1.8 GHz) |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 6 GB RAM + 128 GB | 64 GB · 4 GB RAM |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 11.97″ | 8.68″ |
| Resolution | 2,000 × 1,200 pixels | 1,340 × 800 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 350 nits |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 8,000 mAh | 5,850 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 18W |
| Teclast M60 wins clearly on Battery (9.6 vs 7.7) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 282 × 177 × 8 mm | 212.1 × 124.8 × 7.8 mm |
| Weight | 600 g | 350 g |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| USB | — | USB-C |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | Stereo | Stereo |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 4G | 4G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Front cameras | — | 2 MP |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | — | Compass, Ambient light |
Popular comparisons for Teclast M60
- Teclast M60 vs Teclast T60 MiniOverall scoreTeclast M606.2Teclast T60 Mini6.3Better for Gaming
- Teclast M60 vs Erazer U126Overall scoreTeclast M606.2Erazer U1266.2Better for Gaming
- Teclast M60 vs Alldocube iPlay 80 mini
- Teclast M60 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3
Popular comparisons for Alldocube iPlay 80 mini
- Alldocube iPlay 80 mini vs Erazer U126
- Alldocube iPlay 80 mini vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3Better for Battery life
- Alldocube iPlay 80 mini vs Blackview Mega 12Better for Battery life
- Alldocube iPlay 80 mini vs TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper