Alldocube iPlay 80 mini vs Erazer U126
Alldocube iPlay 80 mini vs Erazer U126 — full specifications compared side by side. Both launched in 2026. Erazer U126 gives you the larger screen — 12.6 inches against 8.7 inches.
Alldocube iPlay 80 mini: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Erazer U126: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Erazer U126
6.2/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Alldocube iPlay 80 mini | Erazer U126 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T610 (2x Cortex-A75 + 6x Cortex-A55, up to 1.8 GHz) | Intel Core Ultra 5 115U (8 cores, 10 threads) |
| Display | 8.68″ · IPS LCD | 12.6″ · OLED · 60 Hz |
| Main camera | 5 MP | — |
| Battery | 5,850 mAh · 18W charging | 65W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 4GB / 64GB | 1TB |
Which is better?
- Alldocube iPlay 80 mini takes 1 of the 1 categories both tablets are scored in.
- Erazer U126 gives you the larger screen — 12.6 inches against 8.7 inches.
- Erazer U126 charges faster — 65W wired against 18W.
- Alldocube iPlay 80 mini is the lighter tablet — 350 g against 760 g.
Category scores
| Category | Alldocube iPlay 80 mini | Erazer U126 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7.7 | — |
| Call Quality | 6.2Better | 4.2 |
| Performance | — | 6.6 |
| Display | — | 6.4 |
| Software | — | 6.2 |
| Audio | — | 5.5 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Alldocube iPlay 80 mini
- Lighter body (350 g vs 760 g)
Erazer U126
- More storage (1 TB vs 64 GB)
- Faster charging (65W vs 18W)
- Larger display (12.6″ vs 8.68″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Alldocube iPlay 80 mini | Erazer U126 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 4 Nov 2026 | Nov 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 16 | Windows 11 and Android 16 (dual operating systems with advertised seamless switching) |
| Chipset (as published) | Unisoc T610 (2x Cortex-A75 + 6x Cortex-A55, up to 1.8 GHz) | Intel Core Ultra 5 115U (8 cores, 10 threads) |
| GPU | — | Intel integrated graphics; Intel AI Boost NPU |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 64 GB · 4 GB RAM | 512 GB · 1 TB · 8 GB · 12 GB · 16 GB |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 8.68″ | 12.6″ |
| Resolution | 1,340 × 800 pixels | 2,560 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | OLED |
| Brightness (peak) | 350 nits | 450 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,850 mAh | — |
| Wired charging | 18W | 65W |
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 212.1 × 124.8 × 7.8 mm | 286.13 × 184.29 × 8.5 mm |
| Weight | 350 g | 760 g |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 | Bluetooth 5 |
| USB | USB-C | USB Type-C (external display output and peripherals) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | — |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | Stereo | — |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Compass, Ambient light | — |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 4G | — |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 5 MP | — |
| Front cameras | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Selfie Camera · Single | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Misc · Price | JPY 19,999 (Japan) | CNY 5,499 (China, 8GB + 512GB) |
Popular comparisons for Alldocube iPlay 80 mini
- Alldocube iPlay 80 mini vs Erazer U126
- Alldocube iPlay 80 mini vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 3Better for Battery life
- Alldocube iPlay 80 mini vs Blackview Mega 12Better for Battery life
- Alldocube iPlay 80 mini vs TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper
Popular comparisons for Erazer U126
- Erazer U126 vs Blackview Mega 12Overall scoreErazer U1266.2Blackview Mega 126.5
- Erazer U126 vs TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaperOverall scoreErazer U1266.2TCL Tab A1 Plus NxtPaper5.8
- Erazer U126 vs TCL Tab A1 PlusOverall scoreErazer U1266.2TCL Tab A1 Plus5.7
- Erazer U126 vs TCL Tab A1Overall scoreErazer U1266.2TCL Tab A16