Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs Philips S7210
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 wins narrowly over Philips S7210 — 7.3 overall against 6.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 launched in 2023; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,400 mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
7.3/ 10 — Good
$1,249≈ €1,116 · ≈ £931≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7210
6.5/ 10 — Average
≈ $168€150 · ≈ £125≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 7.6″ · OLED · 120 Hz | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 4,400 mAh · 25W charging | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | — | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 wins narrowly over Philips S7210 — 7.3 overall against 6.5.
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 takes 3 of the 5 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,400 mAh.
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 gives you the larger screen — 7.6 inches against 6.8 inches.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 8.2Better | 5.2 |
| Battery | 6.6 | 9.0Better |
| Software | 7.4Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 5.6Better | 4.6 |
| Call Quality | 8.0Tie | 7.8Tie |
| Performance | — | 7.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
- Larger display (7.6″ vs 6.75″)
Philips S7210
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 4,400 mAh)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2023 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 13 with One UI 5.1.1 | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (1×3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 + 2×2.8 GHz A715 + 2×2.8 GHz A710 + 3×2.0 GHz A510) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 7.6″ | 6.75″ |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Display protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (front & back) | — |
| Resolution | — | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 wins clearly on Display (8.2 vs 5.2) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,400 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25W | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (6.6 vs 9.0) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Colours | Cream, Icy Blue, Phantom Black, Gray (online), Blue (online) | Black, Titan |
| Dimensions | — | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | — | 203 g |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG capable | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 10 MP (f/2.2) · 4 MP (f/1.8) | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 57.3Infinix Smart 20e5.3Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 57.3Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 57.3vivo Y6k5.5
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 57.3Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72106.5Philips S72216.6
- Philips S7210 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- Philips S7210 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72106.5vivo Y6k5.5Better for Display