Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 vs Philips S7210
Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 wins narrowly over Philips S7210 — 7.2 overall against 6.5. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 launched in 2025; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 5,000 mAh.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 9: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner

Samsung Galaxy XCover 9
7.2/ 10 — Good
$599≈ €537 · ≈ £448≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7210
6.5/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 2400 / Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (market dependent) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.5″ · LCD (other) | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh · 25W charging | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | — | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 wins narrowly over Philips S7210 — 7.2 overall against 6.5.
- Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 takes 3 of the 5 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 5,000 mAh.
- Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 6.5 inches.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.6Better | 5.2 |
| Battery | 7.5 | 9.0Better |
| Software | 7.4Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 6.7Better | 4.6 |
| Call Quality | 8.0Tie | 7.8Tie |
| Performance | — | 7.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Philips S7210
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 6.5″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2025 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Exynos 2400 / Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (market dependent) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 / Adreno 750 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.5″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,408 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | LCD (other) | IPS LCD |
| Display protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 wins clearly on Display (6.6 vs 5.2) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25W | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (7.5 vs 9.0) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 162 × 77 × 10.5 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | — |
| Colours | Black, Orange | Black, Titan |
| Weight | — | 203 g |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Barometer | — |
| Fingerprint | Side-mounted | Side-mounted |
| Face unlock | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 13 MP (f/2) | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
| Main Camera · Features | OIS, PDAF, HDR, LED Flash | LED flash |
Popular comparisons for Samsung Galaxy XCover 9
- Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy XCover 97.2Coolpad Cool X Wide5.3
- Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy XCover 97.2vivo Y6k5.1
- Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy XCover 97.2Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy XCover 9 vs Philips S7221Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy XCover 97.2Philips S72216.6
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72106.5Philips S72216.6
- Philips S7210 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Coolpad Cool X Wide5.3
- Philips S7210 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72106.5vivo Y6k5.1
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72106.5RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro7.5Better for Display
