Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Philips S7221
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra wins clearly over Philips S7221 — 7.2 overall against 5.7. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra launched in 2020; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 5,000 mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
7.2/ 10 — Good
$950≈ €843 · ≈ £704≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 990 (7 nm+)Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.9″ · OLED · 120 Hz | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh · 45W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 12GB / 128GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra wins clearly over Philips S7221 — 7.2 overall against 5.7.
- Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra takes 4 of the 5 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 5,000 mAh.
- Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra gives you the larger screen — 6.9 inches against 6.7 inches.
- Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra charges faster — 45W wired against 25W.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 6.3Better | 3.7 |
| Display | 8.0Better | 5.5 |
| Battery | 8.0Better | 7.4 |
| Design & Build | 7.2 | — |
| Software | 6.6Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 6.8Tie | 6.8Tie |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Call Quality | — | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Faster charging (45W vs 25W)
- More RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB)
- Larger display (6.9″ vs 6.67″)
Philips S7221
- More storage (256 GB vs 128 GB)
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh)
- Lighter body (210 g vs 220 g)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 15 Mar 2020 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 10, One UI 2.5 | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Exynos 990 (7 nm+)Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M5 & 2x2.50 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP11Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra wins clearly on Performance (6.3 vs 3.7) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 12 GB RAM + 128 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Card slot | Shared / hybrid slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.9″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 1,440 × 3,200 pixels | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | 1,400 nits | — |
| Display protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | — |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra wins clearly on Display (8.0 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W | 25W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra wins narrowly on Battery (8.0 vs 7.4) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 166.9 × 76 × 8.8 mm | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | 220 g | 210 g |
| Materials | Glass, Aluminium | — |
| SIM | Single SIM (Nano-SIM and/or eSIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 40 MP wide (f/2.2) | 16 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 40 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.7m, PDAF | 16 MP |
| Connectivity · Radio | FM radio (USA & Canada only) | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Philips S7210Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra7.2Philips S72105.9
- Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Philips S7221Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra7.2Philips S72215.7
- Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra7.2RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultra7.2ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72215.7Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72215.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display