Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Philips S7210
Samsung Galaxy F16 wins clearly over Philips S7210 — 7.6 overall against 6.5. The Samsung Galaxy F16 launched in 2024; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Samsung Galaxy F16 has the bigger battery — 6,000 mAh against 5,700 mAh.
Samsung Galaxy F16: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner
Samsung Galaxy F16
7.6/ 10 — Good
$199≈ €178 · ≈ £149≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7210
6.5/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung Galaxy F16 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G80 / Dimensity 6100 (region-dependent) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.6″ · OLED | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh · 25W charging | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | — | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy F16 wins clearly over Philips S7210 — 7.6 overall against 6.5.
- Samsung Galaxy F16 takes 3 of the 4 categories both phones are scored in.
- Samsung Galaxy F16 has the bigger battery — 6,000 mAh against 5,700 mAh.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung Galaxy F16 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 7.6Better | 5.2 |
| Battery | 8.0 | 9.0Better |
| Software | 7.4Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 6.5Better | 4.6 |
| Performance | — | 7.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung Galaxy F16
- Bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 5,700 mAh)
Philips S7210
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 6.6″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F16 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2024 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 13, One UI Core 5 | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | MediaTek Helio G80 / Dimensity 6100 (region-dependent) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 / Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.6″ | 6.75″ |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Display protection | Not Specified | — |
| Resolution | — | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Samsung Galaxy F16 wins clearly on Display (7.6 vs 5.2) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25W | — |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (8.0 vs 9.0) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| IP rating | IP54 | — |
| Colours | Sky Blue, Sea Green, Graphite | Black, Titan |
| Dimensions | — | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | — | 203 g |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass | — |
| Fingerprint | Side-mounted | Side-mounted |
| Face unlock | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 8 MP (f/2) | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
| Main Camera · Features | HDR, Panorama, LED Flash | LED flash |
Popular comparisons for Samsung Galaxy F16
- Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy F167.6Coolpad Cool X Wide5.3
- Samsung Galaxy F16 vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy F167.6vivo Y6k5.1
- Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy F167.6Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Philips S7221Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy F167.6Philips S72216.6
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72106.5Philips S72216.6
- Philips S7210 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Coolpad Cool X Wide5.3
- Philips S7210 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72106.5vivo Y6k5.1
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72106.5RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro7.5Better for Display