Philips W8568 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro
ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro wins clearly over Philips W8568 — 7.6 overall against 3.9. ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro has the bigger battery — 8,400 mAh against 2,100 mAh.
Philips W8568: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro: Based on announced specs — scored in 8 categories.
Philips W8568
3.9/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsOverall winner
ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro
7.6/ 10 — Good
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Philips W8568 | ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 (2 nm) |
| Display | 4″ · IPS LCD | 6.85″ · OLED · 185 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56", 1µm) |
| Battery | 2,100 mAh | 8,400 mAh · 80W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 1GB / 4GB | 16GB / 1TB |
Which is better?
- ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro wins clearly over Philips W8568 — 7.6 overall against 3.9.
- ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro takes 4 of the 5 categories both phones are scored in.
- ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro has the bigger battery — 8,400 mAh against 2,100 mAh.
- ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro gives you the larger screen — 6.9 inches against 4.0 inches.
- Philips W8568 is the lighter phone — 214 g against 223 g.
Category scores
| Category | Philips W8568 | ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2.0 | 7.9Better |
| Display | 5.2 | 8.3Better |
| Battery | 2.8 | 9.3Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5 | 7.1Better |
| Camera | — | 6.7 |
| Design & Build | — | 7.2 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Philips W8568
- Lighter body (214 g vs 223 g)
ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro
- More storage (1 TB vs 4 GB)
- More RAM (16 GB vs 1 GB)
- Bigger battery (8,400 mAh vs 2,100 mAh)
- Larger display (6.85″ vs 4″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Philips W8568 | ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Discontinued | Announced |
| Release date | Oct 2013 | — |
| Expected release window | — | 18 Nov 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean) | Android 17, Redmagic OS 12 |
| CPU | Quad-core 1.2 GHz | Octa-core (2x5.01 GHz Prime + 3x4.03 GHz Performance + 3x3.74 GHz Performance) |
| Chipset (as published) | — | Qualcomm SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 (2 nm) |
| GPU | — | Adreno 850 |
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro wins clearly on Performance (2.0 vs 7.9) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 1 GB RAM + 4 GB | 12 GB RAM + 256 GB · 16 GB RAM + 512 GB · 16 GB RAM + 1 TB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | None |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 4″ | 6.85″ |
| Resolution | 540 × 960 pixels | 1,216 × 2,688 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | OLED |
| Refresh rate | — | 185 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5,000 nits |
| Display protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro wins clearly on Display (5.2 vs 8.3) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,100 mAh | 8,400 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 80W |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro wins clearly on Battery (2.8 vs 9.3) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 123.5 × 63 × 18.8 mm | 163 × 76 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 214 g | 223 g |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Materials | — | Glass, Aluminium |
| Colours | — | Nightfreeze (Transparent Black), Subzero (Transparent Silver), Skyfrost (Blue Transparent) |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4 | Bluetooth 6 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG, accessory connector, DisplayPort |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 8 MP | 16 MP wide (f/2, 1/3.06", 1.12µm) |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56", 1µm) · 50 MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 1/2.87", 0.61µm) |
| Video (max) | — | 8K@30fps |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass |
| Fingerprint | — | Ultrasonic (under-display) |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 8 MP, AF | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, under display |
| Connectivity · Radio | No | No |
Popular comparisons for Philips W8568
- Philips W8568 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips W85683.9Philips S72105.9Better for Battery life
- Philips W8568 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips W85683.9Philips S72215.7Better for Battery life
- Philips W8568 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips W85683.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Battery life
- Philips W8568 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips W85683.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro
- ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro vs Philips S7210Overall scoreZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Philips S72105.9
- ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro vs Philips S7221Overall scoreZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Philips S72215.7
- ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9
- ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro vs vivo V80 FEOverall scoreZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6vivo V80 FE6.9