Philips W8568 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro

RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly over Philips W8568 — 6.9 overall against 3.9. The Philips W8568 launched in 2013; the RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro in 2026. RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro has the bigger battery — 9,300 mAh against 2,100 mAh.

Philips W8568: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.

RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.

Philips W8568

Philips W8568

Philips · Phone

3.9/ 10 — Below average

Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk

Full specs & details
Overall winner
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro

RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro

RugOne · Phone

6.9/ 10 — Average

Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk

Full specs & details

Key highlights

HighlightPhilips W8568RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
Processor—Mediatek Dimensity 8400 (4 nm)
Display4″ · IPS LCD6.67″ · OLED · 120 Hz
Main camera—64 MP (f/2)
Battery2,100 mAh9,300 mAh · 45W charging
RAM / Storage1GB / 4GB12GB / 512GB

Which is better?

  • RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly over Philips W8568 — 6.9 overall against 3.9.
  • RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro takes 3 of the 5 categories both phones are scored in.
  • RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro has the bigger battery — 9,300 mAh against 2,100 mAh.
  • RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro gives you the larger screen — 6.7 inches against 4.0 inches.
  • Philips W8568 is the lighter phone — 214 g against 477 g.

Category scores

CategoryPhilips W8568RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
Performance2.06.6Better
Display5.27.9Better
Battery2.88.6Better
Software5.8Tie6.0Tie
Audio6.5Better6.0
Camera—5.9
Call Quality—6.3

Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.

Reasons to consider

Philips W8568

  • Lighter body (214 g vs 477 g)

RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro

  • More storage (512 GB vs 4 GB)
  • More RAM (12 GB vs 1 GB)
  • Bigger battery (9,300 mAh vs 2,100 mAh)
  • Larger display (6.67″ vs 4″)

Full specifications side by side

SpecificationPhilips W8568RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
Launch
Launch statusDiscontinuedAvailable
Release dateOct 2013Sep 2026
Platform
OSAndroidAndroid
OS versionAndroid 4.2 (Jelly Bean)Android 16, up to 3 major OS updates
CPUQuad-core 1.2 GHzOcta-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725)
Chipset (as published)—Mediatek Dimensity 8400 (4 nm)
GPU—G720 MC7
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Performance (2.0 vs 6.6)
Memory
Memory variants (RAM/storage)1 GB RAM + 4 GB12 GB RAM + 512 GB
Card slotDedicated slotNone
Display
Display size4″6.67″
Resolution540 × 960 pixels1,220 × 2,712 pixels
Panel typeIPS LCDOLED
Refresh rate—120 Hz
Brightness (peak)—1,700 nits
Display protection—Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Display (5.2 vs 7.9)
Battery
Battery capacity2,100 mAh9,300 mAh
Wired charging—45W
Wireless charging—Yes
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Battery (2.8 vs 8.6)
Body & build
Dimensions123.5 × 63 × 18.8 mm172.5 × 83.4 × 19.1 mm
Weight214 g477 g
SIMDual SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)
Colours—Black, Sand Dune
Connectivity
BluetoothBluetooth 4Bluetooth 5.4
NFCNoYes
USBmicroUSB 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Audio
3.5mm jackYesYes
Camera
Front cameras8 MP32 MP wide (f/2.5, 0.7µm)
Rear cameras—50 MP wide (f/1.9, 1µm) · 64 MP (f/2) · 5 MP ultrawide (f/2.4, 1/2.7")
Video (max)—4K@30/60fps
Features
Sensors—Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Barometer
Fingerprint—Optical (under-display)
Network
Network technologies—2G, 3G, 4G
Additional specifications
Main Camera · FeaturesLED flashLED flash, HDR, panorama
Selfie Camera · Single8 MP, AF32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.7µm
Connectivity · RadioNoWireless FM radio

Popular comparisons for Philips W8568

Popular comparisons for RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro

Scroll to Top