Oppo Reno 17F vs Philips S7221
Oppo Reno 17F vs Philips S7221 — full specifications compared side by side.
One of these devices is still rumored — its specs are not official yet and may change before launch.
Oppo Reno 17F: Based on announced specs — scored in 3 categories.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Philips S7221
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Oppo Reno 17F | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.57″ · OLED | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | — | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 12GB / 512GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Oppo Reno 17F takes 3 of the 3 categories both phones are scored in.
Category scores
| Category | Oppo Reno 17F | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 8.0Better | 3.7 |
| Display | 7.6Better | 5.5 |
| Call Quality | 7.8Better | 6.2 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Battery | — | 7.4 |
| Software | — | 6.0 |
| Audio | — | 6.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Oppo Reno 17F
- More storage (512 GB vs 256 GB)
- More RAM (12 GB vs 8 GB)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Oppo Reno 17F | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Rumored | Available |
| Expected release window | Nov 2026 | — |
| Release date | — | 2026 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 12 GB RAM + 512 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.57″ | 6.67″ |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | — | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Oppo Reno 17F wins clearly on Display (7.6 vs 5.5) | ||
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Platform | ||
| OS | — | Android |
| OS version | — | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | — | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | — | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Oppo Reno 17F wins clearly on Performance (8.0 vs 3.7) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 25W |
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | — | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | — | 210 g |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue, Gray |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | — | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Front cameras | — | 16 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
Popular comparisons for Oppo Reno 17F
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72215.7Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72215.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display