Oppo A95 5G vs vivo V80 FE
vivo V80 FE wins narrowly over Oppo A95 5G — 6.9 overall against 6.0. vivo V80 FE has the bigger battery — 7,000 mAh against 4,310 mAh.
vivo V80 FE: Based on announced specs — scored in 8 categories.

Oppo A95 5G
6.0/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsOverall winner

vivo V80 FE
6.9/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Oppo A95 5G | vivo V80 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Turbo (4 nm) |
| Display | 6.43″ · OLED | 6.59″ · OLED · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | 48 MP wide (f/1.7, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56") |
| Battery | 4,310 mAh · 30W charging | 7,000 mAh · 90W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 8GB / 256GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- vivo V80 FE wins narrowly over Oppo A95 5G — 6.9 overall against 6.0.
- vivo V80 FE takes 4 of the 7 categories both phones are scored in.
- vivo V80 FE has the bigger battery — 7,000 mAh against 4,310 mAh.
- On paper, vivo V80 FE has the higher-resolution main camera — 50 MP against 48 MP.
- vivo V80 FE charges faster — 90W wired against 30W.
Category scores
| Category | Oppo A95 5G | vivo V80 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4.1 | 6.1Better |
| Camera | 6.5Tie | 6.5Tie |
| Display | 7.0 | 8.0Better |
| Battery | 6.2 | 8.8Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5 | 6.9Better |
| Call Quality | 7.8Better | 6.2 |
| Design & Build | — | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Oppo A95 5G
- Lighter body (173 g vs 201 g)
vivo V80 FE
- Faster charging (90W vs 30W)
- Bigger battery (7,000 mAh vs 4,310 mAh)
- Higher-resolution main camera (50 MP vs 48 MP)
- Larger display (6.59″ vs 6.43″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Oppo A95 5G | vivo V80 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Announced |
| Release date | 8 May 2021 | — |
| Expected release window | — | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 17, OriginOS 7 |
| Chipset | Dimensity 800U | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Turbo (4 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Performance (4.1 vs 6.1) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB | 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Card slot | — | None |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.43″ | 6.59″ |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,400 pixels | 1,260 × 2,750 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | OLED |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Display (7.0 vs 8.0) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,310 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 30W | 90W |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Battery (6.2 vs 8.8) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 160.1 × 73.4 × 7.8 mm | 157.8 × 74.5 × 7.8 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 201 g |
| Colours | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver | Chill Green, Sparkling Gold |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Materials | — | Glass, Plastic |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX HD | — |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass |
| Fingerprint | Optical (under-display) | Optical (under-display) |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 48 MP wide (f/1.7, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) · 8 MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) · 2 MP macro | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56") · 50 MP ultrawide (f/2.1) |
| Front cameras | 16 MP wide (f/2.4, 1/3.09", 1µm) | 50 MP wide (f/2) |
| Video (max) | 4K@30fps | 4K |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Network · Bands 2g | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| Network · Bands 3g | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| Network · Bands 4g | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 25, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| Network · Bands 5g | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Network · Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera · Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF |
| Selfie Camera · Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K, 1080p |
| Connectivity · Radio | No | No |
Popular comparisons for Oppo A95 5G
- Oppo A95 5G vs Philips S7210Overall scoreOppo A95 5G6Philips S72105.9Better for Battery life
- Oppo A95 5G vs Philips S7221Overall scoreOppo A95 5G6Philips S72215.7Better for Battery life
- Oppo A95 5G vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreOppo A95 5G6RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Oppo A95 5G vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreOppo A95 5G6ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
Popular comparisons for vivo V80 FE
- vivo V80 FE vs Philips S7210Overall scorevivo V80 FE6.9Philips S72105.9
- vivo V80 FE vs Philips S7221Overall scorevivo V80 FE6.9Philips S72215.7
- vivo V80 FE vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- vivo V80 FE vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
