Oppo A95 5G vs Philips S7221
Oppo A95 5G vs Philips S7221 is too close to call — 6.0 overall against 5.7. The Oppo A95 5G launched in 2021; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,310 mAh.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Oppo A95 5G
6.0/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Oppo A95 5G | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.43″ · OLED | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | 48 MP wide (f/1.7, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) | 64 MP |
| Battery | 4,310 mAh · 30W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 8GB / 256GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Oppo A95 5G vs Philips S7221 is too close to call — 6.0 overall against 5.7.
- Oppo A95 5G takes 4 of the 7 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,310 mAh.
- Philips S7221 gives you the larger screen — 6.7 inches against 6.4 inches.
- On paper, Philips S7221 has the higher-resolution main camera — 64 MP against 48 MP.
Category scores
| Category | Oppo A95 5G | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4.1Better | 3.7 |
| Camera | 6.5Better | 5.9 |
| Display | 7.0Better | 5.5 |
| Battery | 6.2 | 7.4Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5Tie | 6.8Tie |
| Call Quality | 7.8Better | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Oppo A95 5G
- Lighter body (173 g vs 210 g)
- Faster charging (30W vs 25W)
Philips S7221
- Higher-resolution main camera (64 MP vs 48 MP)
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 4,310 mAh)
- Larger display (6.67″ vs 6.43″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Oppo A95 5G | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 8 May 2021 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 16 |
| Chipset | Dimensity 800U | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Oppo A95 5G wins narrowly on Performance (4.1 vs 3.7) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.43″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,400 pixels | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Oppo A95 5G wins clearly on Display (7.0 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,310 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 30W | 25W |
| Philips S7221 wins clearly on Battery (6.2 vs 7.4) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 160.1 × 73.4 × 7.8 mm | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 210 g |
| Colours | Fluid Black, Cosmo Blue, Silver | Black, Blue, Gray |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX HD | — |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass | — |
| Fingerprint | Optical (under-display) | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 48 MP wide (f/1.7, 1/2.0", 0.8µm) · 8 MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 1/4.0", 1.12µm) · 2 MP macro | 64 MP |
| Front cameras | 16 MP wide (f/2.4, 1/3.09", 1µm) | 16 MP |
| Video (max) | 4K@30fps | Yes |
| Oppo A95 5G wins narrowly on Camera (6.5 vs 5.9) | ||
| Additional specifications | ||
| Network · Bands 2g | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| Network · Bands 3g | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| Network · Bands 4g | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Network · Bands 5g | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Network · Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Main Camera · Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS | Yes |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm | 16 MP |
| Selfie Camera · Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for Oppo A95 5G
- Oppo A95 5G vs Philips S7210Overall scoreOppo A95 5G6Philips S72105.9Better for Battery life
- Oppo A95 5G vs Philips S7221Overall scoreOppo A95 5G6Philips S72215.7Better for Battery life
- Oppo A95 5G vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreOppo A95 5G6RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Oppo A95 5G vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreOppo A95 5G6ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72215.7Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72215.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display