Mitac MIO A702 vs vivo V80 FE
vivo V80 FE wins clearly over Mitac MIO A702 — 6.9 overall against 4.2. vivo V80 FE has the bigger battery — 7,000 mAh against 1,130 mAh.
Mitac MIO A702: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
vivo V80 FE: Based on announced specs — scored in 8 categories.
Mitac MIO A702
4.2/ 10 — Below average
≈ $381€340 · ≈ £284≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsOverall winner
vivo V80 FE
6.9/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Mitac MIO A702 | vivo V80 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | TI OMAP 850 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Turbo (4 nm) |
| Display | 2.7″ · LCD (other) | 6.59″ · OLED · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56") |
| Battery | 1,130 mAh | 7,000 mAh · 90W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 2GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- vivo V80 FE wins clearly over Mitac MIO A702 — 6.9 overall against 4.2.
- vivo V80 FE takes 3 of the 4 categories both phones are scored in.
- vivo V80 FE has the bigger battery — 7,000 mAh against 1,130 mAh.
- vivo V80 FE gives you the larger screen — 6.6 inches against 2.7 inches.
- Mitac MIO A702 is the lighter phone — 148 g against 201 g.
Category scores
| Category | Mitac MIO A702 | vivo V80 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4.6 | 8.0Better |
| Battery | 2.2 | 8.8Better |
| Software | 6.0Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 5.4 | 6.9Better |
| Performance | — | 6.1 |
| Camera | — | 6.5 |
| Design & Build | — | 6.2 |
| Call Quality | — | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Mitac MIO A702
- Lighter body (148 g vs 201 g)
vivo V80 FE
- More storage (256 GB vs 2 GB)
- Bigger battery (7,000 mAh vs 1,130 mAh)
- Larger display (6.59″ vs 2.7″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Mitac MIO A702 | vivo V80 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Discontinued | Announced |
| Release date | Nov 2007 | — |
| Expected release window | — | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Windows | Android |
| OS version | Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.0 Professional | Android 17, OriginOS 7 |
| Chipset (as published) | TI OMAP 850 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Turbo (4 nm) |
| CPU | 200 MHz ARM926EJ-S | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | — | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 2 GB | 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | None |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 2.7″ | 6.59″ |
| Resolution | 240 × 320 pixels | 1,260 × 2,750 pixels |
| Panel type | LCD (other) | OLED |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3,000 nits |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Display (4.6 vs 8.0) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,130 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 90W |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Battery (2.2 vs 8.8) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 110 × 57.5 × 16.5 mm | 157.8 × 74.5 × 7.8 mm |
| Weight | 148 g | 201 g |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Materials | — | Glass, Plastic |
| Colours | — | Chill Green, Sparkling Gold |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| USB | miniUSB 1.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| Positioning | — | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 3.15 MP | 50 MP wide (f/2) |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56") · 50 MP ultrawide (f/2.1) |
| Video (max) | — | 4K |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass |
| Fingerprint | — | Optical (under-display) |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash | Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 3.15 MP, AF | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF |
| Connectivity · Radio | No | No |
Popular comparisons for Mitac MIO A702
- Mitac MIO A702 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreMitac MIO A7024.2ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Battery life
- Mitac MIO A702 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scoreMitac MIO A7024.2vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Battery life
- Mitac MIO A702 vs Karbonn Rebel ProOverall scoreMitac MIO A7024.2Karbonn Rebel Pro5.8Better for Battery life
- Mitac MIO A702 vs Karbonn RebelOverall scoreMitac MIO A7024.2Karbonn Rebel5.7Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for vivo V80 FE
- vivo V80 FE vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- vivo V80 FE vs Karbonn Rebel ProOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9Karbonn Rebel Pro5.8
- vivo V80 FE vs Karbonn RebelOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9Karbonn Rebel5.7
- vivo V80 FE vs Xiaomi Redmi M100 ProOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro7.1Better for Design