Mitac MIO A702 vs Karbonn Rebel
Karbonn Rebel wins clearly over Mitac MIO A702 — 5.7 overall against 4.2. The Mitac MIO A702 launched in 2007; the Karbonn Rebel in 2026. Karbonn Rebel has the bigger battery — 7,000 mAh against 1,130 mAh.
Mitac MIO A702: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Karbonn Rebel: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Mitac MIO A702
4.2/ 10 — Below average
≈ $381€340 · ≈ £284≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsOverall winner
Karbonn Rebel
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Mitac MIO A702 | Karbonn Rebel |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | TI OMAP 850 | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| Display | 2.7″ · LCD (other) | 6.75″ · LCD (other) · 90 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 1,130 mAh | 7,000 mAh · 18W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 2GB | 6GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Karbonn Rebel wins clearly over Mitac MIO A702 — 5.7 overall against 4.2.
- Karbonn Rebel takes 2 of the 3 categories both phones are scored in.
- Karbonn Rebel has the bigger battery — 7,000 mAh against 1,130 mAh.
- Karbonn Rebel gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 2.7 inches.
Category scores
| Category | Mitac MIO A702 | Karbonn Rebel |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4.6 | 5.0Better |
| Battery | 2.2 | 7.5Better |
| Software | 6.0Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 5.4 | — |
| Performance | — | 4.7 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Karbonn Rebel
- More storage (128 GB vs 2 GB)
- Bigger battery (7,000 mAh vs 1,130 mAh)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 2.7″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Mitac MIO A702 | Karbonn Rebel |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Discontinued | Available |
| Release date | Nov 2007 | 4 Nov 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Windows | Android |
| OS version | Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.0 Professional | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | TI OMAP 850 | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| CPU | 200 MHz ARM926EJ-S | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 2 GB | 6 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 2.7″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 240 × 320 pixels | — |
| Panel type | LCD (other) | LCD (other) |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 650 nits |
| Karbonn Rebel wins narrowly on Display (4.6 vs 5.0) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,130 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 18W |
| Karbonn Rebel wins clearly on Battery (2.2 vs 7.5) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 110 × 57.5 × 16.5 mm | — |
| Weight | 148 g | — |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | — |
| Colours | — | Blue, Gold, Silver |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2 | — |
| USB | miniUSB 1.1 | — |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 3.15 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G |
Popular comparisons for Mitac MIO A702
- Mitac MIO A702 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreMitac MIO A7024.2ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Battery life
- Mitac MIO A702 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scoreMitac MIO A7024.2vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Battery life
- Mitac MIO A702 vs Karbonn Rebel ProOverall scoreMitac MIO A7024.2Karbonn Rebel Pro5.8Better for Battery life
- Mitac MIO A702 vs Karbonn RebelOverall scoreMitac MIO A7024.2Karbonn Rebel5.7Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Karbonn Rebel
- Karbonn Rebel vs Karbonn Rebel ProOverall scoreKarbonn Rebel5.7Karbonn Rebel Pro5.8
- Karbonn Rebel vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreKarbonn Rebel5.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Display
- Karbonn Rebel vs vivo V80 FEOverall scoreKarbonn Rebel5.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display
- Karbonn Rebel vs Xiaomi Redmi M100 ProOverall scoreKarbonn Rebel5.7Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro7.1Better for Display