iTel A90 vs Philips S7210
Philips S7210 wins narrowly over iTel A90 — 6.5 overall against 6.1. The iTel A90 launched in 2023; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 5,000 mAh.
iTel A90: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.

iTel A90
6.1/ 10 — Average
$110≈ €98 · ≈ £82≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsOverall winner

Philips S7210
6.5/ 10 — Average
≈ $168€150 · ≈ £125≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | iTel A90 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9863A1 (28nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.6″ · IPS LCD | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh · 10W charging | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | — | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Philips S7210 wins narrowly over iTel A90 — 6.5 overall against 6.1.
- Category by category it is split — 1 scored categories each, with 2 tied.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 5,000 mAh.
Category scores
| Category | iTel A90 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.2Tie | 5.2Tie |
| Battery | 6.9 | 9.0Better |
| Software | 6.0Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5Better | 4.6 |
| Performance | — | 7.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Philips S7210
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 6.6″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | iTel A90 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2023 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 12 (Go Edition) | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Unisoc SC9863A1 (28nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.6″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 720 × 1,612 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Display protection | None | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10W | — |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (6.9 vs 9.0) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 164.2 × 75.5 × 8.5 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Colours | Blue, Green, Black | Black, Titan |
| Weight | — | 203 g |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity | — |
| Face unlock | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 5 MP (f/2.2) | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Connectivity · Radio | FM RADIO | Unspecified |
| Main Camera · Features | HDR, LED Flash | LED flash |
Popular comparisons for iTel A90
- iTel A90 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scoreiTel A906.1Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- iTel A90 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreiTel A906.1Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1
- iTel A90 vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreiTel A906.1vivo Y6k5.5Better for Display
- iTel A90 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreiTel A906.1Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72106.5Philips S72216.6
- Philips S7210 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- Philips S7210 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72106.5vivo Y6k5.5Better for Display
