Huawei Mate 40 vs Philips S7210
Huawei Mate 40 vs Philips S7210 is too close to call — 6.5 overall against 6.5. The Huawei Mate 40 launched in 2020; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,200 mAh.
Huawei Mate 40: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.

Huawei Mate 40
6.5/ 10 — Average
$1,089.99≈ €974 · ≈ £812≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7210
6.5/ 10 — Average
≈ $168€150 · ≈ £125≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Huawei Mate 40 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Kirin 9000E 5G (5 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.5″ · OLED · 90 Hz | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 4,200 mAh · 40W charging | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | 8GB / 256GB | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Huawei Mate 40 vs Philips S7210 is too close to call — 6.5 overall against 6.5.
- Category by category it is split — 2 scored categories each, with 1 tied.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,200 mAh.
- Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 6.5 inches.
- Huawei Mate 40 is the lighter phone — 188 g against 203 g.
Category scores
| Category | Huawei Mate 40 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5.5 | 7.0Better |
| Display | 7.5Better | 5.2 |
| Battery | 6.8 | 9.0Better |
| Design & Build | 7.2 | — |
| Software | 5.7Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5Better | 4.6 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Huawei Mate 40
- More storage (256 GB vs 128 GB)
- Lighter body (188 g vs 203 g)
Philips S7210
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 4,200 mAh)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 6.5″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Huawei Mate 40 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 21 Dec 2020 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 10, EMUI 11, no Google Play Services | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Kirin 9000E 5G (5 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G78 MP22 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Performance (5.5 vs 7.0) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Card slot | Shared / hybrid slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.5″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,376 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — |
| Huawei Mate 40 wins clearly on Display (7.5 vs 5.2) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 40W | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (6.8 vs 9.0) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 158.6 × 72.5 × 8.8 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 203 g |
| Materials | Glass, Aluminium, Vegan leather | — |
| SIM | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Colours | — | Black, Titan |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, USB On-The-Go | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 13 MP ultrawide (f/2.4) | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | Leica optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, 18mm (ultrawide) | 8 MP |
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for Huawei Mate 40
- Huawei Mate 40 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scoreHuawei Mate 406.5Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- Huawei Mate 40 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreHuawei Mate 406.5Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1Better for Gaming
- Huawei Mate 40 vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreHuawei Mate 406.5vivo Y6k5.5
- Huawei Mate 40 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreHuawei Mate 406.5Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72106.5Philips S72216.6
- Philips S7210 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- Philips S7210 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72106.5Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72106.5vivo Y6k5.5Better for Display
