Blackview BL7000 vs Philips S7221
Blackview BL7000 wins narrowly over Philips S7221 — 6.3 overall against 5.7. The Blackview BL7000 launched in 2025; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Blackview BL7000 has the bigger battery — 7,500 mAh against 5,700 mAh.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner
Blackview BL7000
6.3/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Blackview BL7000 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.78″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | 50 MP wide (f/1.8, 1/2.76") | 64 MP |
| Battery | 7,500 mAh · 33W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 8GB / 256GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Blackview BL7000 wins narrowly over Philips S7221 — 6.3 overall against 5.7.
- Blackview BL7000 takes 4 of the 7 categories both phones are scored in.
- Blackview BL7000 has the bigger battery — 7,500 mAh against 5,700 mAh.
- On paper, Philips S7221 has the higher-resolution main camera — 64 MP against 50 MP.
- Blackview BL7000 charges faster — 33W wired against 25W.
Category scores
| Category | Blackview BL7000 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5.2Better | 3.7 |
| Camera | 5.7Tie | 5.9Tie |
| Display | 6.2Better | 5.5 |
| Battery | 7.9Better | 7.4 |
| Software | 6.0Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5Tie | 6.8Tie |
| Call Quality | 7.8Better | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Blackview BL7000
- Faster charging (33W vs 25W)
- Bigger battery (7,500 mAh vs 5,700 mAh)
- Larger display (6.78″ vs 6.67″)
Philips S7221
- Lighter body (210 g vs 357 g)
- Higher-resolution main camera (64 MP vs 50 MP)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Blackview BL7000 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | May 2025 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 15, DokeOS 4.1 | Android 16 |
| Chipset | Dimensity 6300 | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Blackview BL7000 wins clearly on Performance (5.2 vs 3.7) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 8 GB RAM + 256 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Card slot | Shared / hybrid slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.78″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,460 pixels | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | 750 nits | — |
| Display protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Blackview BL7000 wins narrowly on Display (6.2 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,500 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33W | 25W |
| Blackview BL7000 wins narrowly on Battery (7.9 vs 7.4) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 182.2 × 86 × 14.5 mm | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | 357 g | 210 g |
| Colours | Black, Orange | Black, Blue, Gray |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass | — |
| Fingerprint | Side-mounted | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 50 MP wide (f/1.8, 1/2.76") · 20 MP (f/2, 1/2.8") | 64 MP |
| Front cameras | 32 MP wide (f/2.2) | 16 MP |
| Video (max) | 1440p@30fps | Yes |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Network · Bands 2g | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| Network · Bands 3g | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| Network · Bands 4g | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Network · Bands 5g | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Network · Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Main Camera · Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP |
| Selfie Camera · Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Connectivity · Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| Misc · Price | About 260 EUR | ₹ 19,499 |
Popular comparisons for Blackview BL7000
- Blackview BL7000 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreBlackview BL70006.3Philips S72105.9
- Blackview BL7000 vs Philips S7221Overall scoreBlackview BL70006.3Philips S72215.7
- Blackview BL7000 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreBlackview BL70006.3RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Blackview BL7000 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreBlackview BL70006.3ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72215.7Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72215.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display