BenQ A500 vs Philips S7221
BenQ A500 vs Philips S7221 — full specifications compared side by side. The BenQ A500 launched in 2004; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 700 mAh.
BenQ A500: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Philips S7221
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | BenQ A500 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 1.9″ · LCD (other) | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | 700 mAh | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | — | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Philips S7221 takes 3 of the 3 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 700 mAh.
- Philips S7221 gives you the larger screen — 6.7 inches against 1.9 inches.
- BenQ A500 is the lighter phone — 98 g against 210 g.
Category scores
| Category | BenQ A500 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4.6 | 5.5Better |
| Battery | 2.2 | 7.4Better |
| Audio | 4.6 | 6.8Better |
| Performance | — | 3.7 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Software | — | 6.0 |
| Call Quality | — | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
BenQ A500
- Lighter body (98 g vs 210 g)
Philips S7221
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 700 mAh)
- Larger display (6.67″ vs 1.9″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | BenQ A500 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Discontinued | Available |
| Announced date | 2004 | — |
| Release date | — | 2026 |
| Memory | ||
| Card slot | None | — |
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 1.9″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 128 × 160 pixels | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | LCD (other) | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Philips S7221 wins narrowly on Display (4.6 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 700 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 25W |
| Philips S7221 wins clearly on Battery (2.2 vs 7.4) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 83.5 × 45 × 23.1 mm | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | 98 g | 210 g |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | None | — |
| NFC | — | No |
| USB | — | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | — | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | None | Stereo |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| OS | — | Android |
| OS version | — | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | — | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | — | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Front cameras | — | 16 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Selfie Camera · Single | VGA | 16 MP |
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for BenQ A500
- BenQ A500 vs Philips S7210Better for Battery life
- BenQ A500 vs Philips S7221Better for Battery life
- BenQ A500 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Battery life
- BenQ A500 vs Samsung Galaxy A58
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72215.7Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72215.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display