XOLO Q1100 vs Philips S7210
Philips S7210 wins clearly over XOLO Q1100 — 5.9 overall against 3.8. The XOLO Q1100 launched in 2014; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 2,000 mAh.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.

XOLO Q1100
3.8/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsOverall winner

Philips S7210
5.9/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | XOLO Q1100 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm MSM8228 Snapdragon 400 (28 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 5″ · IPS LCD | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 2,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | 1GB / 8GB | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Philips S7210 wins clearly over XOLO Q1100 — 5.9 overall against 3.8.
- Philips S7210 takes 4 of the 7 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 2,000 mAh.
- Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 5.0 inches.
- On paper, Philips S7210 has the higher-resolution main camera — 50 MP against 8 MP.
Category scores
| Category | XOLO Q1100 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2.0 | 4.6Better |
| Camera | 3.5 | 5.7Better |
| Display | 5.2Tie | 5.2Tie |
| Battery | 2.8 | 8.2Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5Better | 5.4 |
| Call Quality | 4.4 | 7.2Better |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Philips S7210
- More storage (128 GB vs 8 GB)
- More RAM (8 GB vs 1 GB)
- Higher-resolution main camera (50 MP vs 8 MP)
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 2,000 mAh)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | XOLO Q1100 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Discontinued | Available |
| Release date | Jan 2014 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 4.3 (Jelly Bean) | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm MSM8228 Snapdragon 400 (28 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 305 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Performance (2.0 vs 4.6) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 1 GB RAM + 8 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 5″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 720 × 1,280 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (2.8 vs 8.2) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 143.8 × 70.8 × 8.3 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Colours | Black, White | Black, Titan |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Mini-SIM) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | — | 203 g |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 3 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity, Compass | — |
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 3G | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Front cameras | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| Video (max) | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Camera (3.5 vs 5.7) | ||
| Additional specifications | ||
| Network · Bands 2g | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| Network · Bands 3g | HSDPA 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| Network · Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash |
| Main Camera · Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 2 MP | 8 MP |
| Connectivity · Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| Misc · Price | About 140 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Popular comparisons for XOLO Q1100
- XOLO Q1100 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreXOLO Q11003.8Philips S72105.9Better for Battery life
- XOLO Q1100 vs Philips S7221Overall scoreXOLO Q11003.8Philips S72215.7Better for Battery life
- XOLO Q1100 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreXOLO Q11003.8RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Battery life
- XOLO Q1100 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreXOLO Q11003.8ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72105.9Philips S72215.7
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Philips S7210 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72105.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display
