vivo X200 Ultra vs Philips S7210
vivo X200 Ultra wins clearly over Philips S7210 — 7.8 overall against 5.9. The vivo X200 Ultra launched in 2025; the Philips S7210 in 2026. vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery — 6,000 mAh against 5,700 mAh.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner

vivo X200 Ultra
7.8/ 10 — Good
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & details
Philips S7210
5.9/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | vivo X200 Ultra | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.82″ · OLED · 120 Hz | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | 200 MP periscope (f/2.3, OIS) | 50 MP |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh · 90W charging | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | 16GB / 1TB | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- vivo X200 Ultra wins clearly over Philips S7210 — 7.8 overall against 5.9.
- vivo X200 Ultra takes 6 of the 7 categories both phones are scored in.
- vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery — 6,000 mAh against 5,700 mAh.
- On paper, vivo X200 Ultra has the higher-resolution main camera — 200 MP against 50 MP.
- Philips S7210 is the lighter phone — 203 g against 229 g.
Category scores
| Category | vivo X200 Ultra | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 7.8Better | 4.6 |
| Camera | 7.4Better | 5.7 |
| Display | 9.0Better | 5.2 |
| Battery | 9.0Better | 8.2 |
| Design & Build | 7.2 | — |
| Software | 6.0Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.9Better | 5.4 |
| Call Quality | 7.8Better | 7.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
vivo X200 Ultra
- More storage (1 TB vs 128 GB)
- Higher-resolution main camera (200 MP vs 50 MP)
- More RAM (16 GB vs 8 GB)
- Bigger battery (6,000 mAh vs 5,700 mAh)
Philips S7210
- Lighter body (203 g vs 229 g)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | vivo X200 Ultra | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 29 Apr 2025 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 16 |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| vivo X200 Ultra wins clearly on Performance (7.8 vs 4.6) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 12 GB RAM + 256 GB · 12 GB RAM + 512 GB · 16 GB RAM + 512 GB · 16 GB RAM + 1 TB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Card slot | None | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.82″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 1,440 × 3,168 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Brightness (peak) | 4,500 nits | — |
| Display protection | Armor glass | — |
| vivo X200 Ultra wins clearly on Display (9.0 vs 5.2) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 90W | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| vivo X200 Ultra wins narrowly on Battery (9.0 vs 8.2) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 163.1 × 76.8 × 8.7 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 229 g | 203 g |
| Materials | Glass, Aluminium | — |
| Colours | Black, Silver, Red | Black, Titan |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | Stereo | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass | — |
| Fingerprint | Ultrasonic (under-display) | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 50 MP wide (f/1.7, OIS) · 200 MP periscope (f/2.3, OIS) · 50 MP ultrawide (f/2, OIS) | 50 MP |
| Front cameras | 50 MP wide (f/2.5) | 8 MP |
| Video (max) | 8K@30fps | Yes |
| vivo X200 Ultra wins clearly on Camera (7.4 vs 5.7) | ||
| Additional specifications | ||
| Network · Bands 2g | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| Network · Bands 3g | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| Network · Bands 4g | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Network · Bands 5g | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Network · Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Main Camera · Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import | LED flash |
| Main Camera · Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit Log, HDR10+ | Yes |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 8 MP |
| Selfie Camera · Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | Yes |
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
| Misc · Price | About 780 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Popular comparisons for vivo X200 Ultra
- vivo X200 Ultra vs Philips S7210Overall scorevivo X200 Ultra7.8Philips S72105.9
- vivo X200 Ultra vs Philips S7221Overall scorevivo X200 Ultra7.8Philips S72215.7
- vivo X200 Ultra vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorevivo X200 Ultra7.8RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9
- vivo X200 Ultra vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorevivo X200 Ultra7.8ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72105.9Philips S72215.7
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Philips S7210 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72105.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display
