Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V vs Philips S7221
Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V vs Philips S7221 — full specifications compared side by side. The Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V launched in 2020; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V gives you the larger screen — 174.5 inches against 6.7 inches.
Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V
$1,449.99≈ €1,292 · ≈ £1,077≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
5.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ 5G SM8250-AB (Kona), 2020, 64 bit, octa-core, 32 Kbyte I-Cache, 32 Kbyte D-Cache, 2304 Kbyte L2, 4096 Kbyte L3, 7 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 650 GPU | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 174.5″ · OLED | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | 25W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 512GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V takes 2 of the 3 categories both phones are scored in.
- Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V gives you the larger screen — 174.5 inches against 6.7 inches.
- Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V is the lighter phone — 208 g against 210 g.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.0Better | 5.5 |
| Battery | 7.3Tie | 7.4Tie |
| Software | 6.6Better | 6.0 |
| Performance | — | 3.7 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Audio | — | 6.8 |
| Call Quality | — | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V
- Larger display (174.5″ vs 6.67″)
- More storage (512 GB vs 256 GB)
- Lighter body (208 g vs 210 g)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2020 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Google Android 10 (Q) | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ 5G SM8250-AB (Kona), 2020, 64 bit, octa-core, 32 Kbyte I-Cache, 32 Kbyte D-Cache, 2304 Kbyte L2, 4096 Kbyte L3, 7 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 650 GPU | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | 3091.0 MHz | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 512 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 174.5″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 1,440 × 3,088 pixels | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Display protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V wins narrowly on Display (6.0 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Wired charging | 25W | 25W |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,700 mAh |
| Body & build | ||
| Weight | 208 g | 210 g |
| Dimensions | — | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Colours | — | Black, Blue, Gray |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 | — |
| USB | USB C reversible; USB charging , USB fast charging , USB Host , USB OTG 1.3 , USB OTG 2.0 , USB PD , USB PD 2.0 , USB PD 3.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| NFC | — | No |
| Positioning | — | GPS |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 10 MP | 16 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | EIS , EIS (video) , OIS , OIS (video) , Pixel unification , HDR photo , HDR video , Red-eye reduction , Slow motion video , Burst mode , Refocus , Touch focus , Macro mode , Panorama Photo , Face detection , Face tagging , Smile detection , Face retouch , Face retouch (video) , Intelligent scene detection | LED flash |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 10.0 MP | 16 MP |
Popular comparisons for Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V
- Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V vs Samsung Galaxy A58
- Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V vs Samsung Galaxy A38Better for Battery life
- Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V vs Honor 700S
- Samsung SM-N986U Galaxy Note 20 Ultra UW 5G TD-LTE US 512GB / SM-N986V vs Philips S7210Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72215.7Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72215.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72215.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display