Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V vs Samsung Galaxy A58
Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V vs Samsung Galaxy A58 — full specifications compared side by side. Samsung Galaxy A58 charges faster — 45W wired against 15W.
One of these devices is still rumored — its specs are not official yet and may change before launch.
Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Samsung Galaxy A58: Based on announced specs — scored in 2 categories.
Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V
$999.99≈ €888 · ≈ £741≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G SM8350 (Lahaina), 2021, 64 bit, octa-core, 5 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 660 GPU | — |
| Display | 170.3″ · OLED | — |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP wide |
| Battery | 15W charging | 45W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 128GB | — |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy A58 charges faster — 45W wired against 15W.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.6 | — |
| Battery | 6.2 | — |
| Software | 6.6 | — |
| Camera | — | 6.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung Galaxy A58
- Faster charging (45W vs 15W)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Rumored |
| Release date | 2021 | — |
| Expected release window | — | Mar 2027 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | — |
| OS version | Google Android 11 (R) | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G SM8350 (Lahaina), 2021, 64 bit, octa-core, 5 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 660 GPU | — |
| CPU | 2842.0 MHz | — |
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 660 | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 128 GB | — |
| Card slot | None | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 170.3″ | — |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,640 pixels | — |
| Panel type | OLED | — |
| Display protection | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Wired charging | 15W | 45W |
| Body & build | ||
| Weight | 183 g | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 | — |
| USB | USB C reversible; USB charging , USB fast charging , USB Host , USB OTG 1.3 , USB OTG 2.0 , USB PD , USB PD 2.0 | — |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 10 MP | 12 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP wide · 12 MP ultrawide · 5 MP macro |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Selfie Camera · Single | 10.0 MP | 12 MP |
Popular comparisons for Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V
- Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V vs Samsung Galaxy A58
- Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V vs Samsung Galaxy A38Better for Battery life
- Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V vs Philips S7210Better for Battery life
- Samsung SM-F711U Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G UW TD-LTE US 128GB / SM-F711V vs Philips S7221Better for Battery life