Samsung Gear S3 frontier vs Philips S7210
Samsung Gear S3 frontier vs Philips S7210 is too close to call — 5.8 overall against 5.9. The Samsung Gear S3 frontier launched in 2016; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 380 mAh.
Samsung Gear S3 frontier: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Samsung Gear S3 frontier
5.8/ 10 — Below average
≈ $237€210 · ≈ £175≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7210
5.9/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung Gear S3 frontier | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 7 Dual 7270 (14 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 1.3″ · OLED | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 380 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | 4GB | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Samsung Gear S3 frontier vs Philips S7210 is too close to call — 5.8 overall against 5.9.
- Category by category it is split — 1 scored categories each, with 1 tied.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 380 mAh.
- Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 1.3 inches.
- Samsung Gear S3 frontier is the lighter phone — 63 g against 203 g.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung Gear S3 frontier | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 7.2Better | 5.2 |
| Battery | 3.1 | 8.2Better |
| Design & Build | 8.0 | — |
| Audio | 5.4Tie | 5.4Tie |
| Performance | — | 4.6 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Software | — | 6.0 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung Gear S3 frontier
- Lighter body (63 g vs 203 g)
Philips S7210
- More storage (128 GB vs 4 GB)
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 380 mAh)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 1.3″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung Gear S3 frontier | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | Nov 2016 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS version | Tizen-based wearable platform 4.0 | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Exynos 7 Dual 7270 (14 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Dual-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| OS | — | Android |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 4 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Card slot | None | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 1.3″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 360 × 360 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Display protection | Corning Gorilla Glass SR+ | — |
| Samsung Gear S3 frontier wins clearly on Display (7.2 vs 5.2) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 380 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (3.1 vs 8.2) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 49 × 46 × 12.9 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 63 g | 203 g |
| Materials | Glass, Stainless steel | — |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Colours | — | Black, Titan |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | No | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GLONASS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Front cameras | — | 8 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for Samsung Gear S3 frontier
- Samsung Gear S3 frontier vs Philips S7210Overall scoreSamsung Gear S3 frontier5.8Philips S72105.9Better for Battery life
- Samsung Gear S3 frontier vs Philips S7221Overall scoreSamsung Gear S3 frontier5.8Philips S72215.7Better for Battery life
- Samsung Gear S3 frontier vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreSamsung Gear S3 frontier5.8RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Battery life
- Samsung Gear S3 frontier vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreSamsung Gear S3 frontier5.8ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72105.9Philips S72215.7
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Philips S7210 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72105.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display