Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs Philips S7221
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 wins narrowly over Philips S7221 — 7.3 overall against 6.6. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 launched in 2023; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,400 mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
7.3/ 10 — Good
$1,249≈ €1,116 · ≈ £931≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
6.6/ 10 — Average
≈ $208≈ €185 · ≈ £155≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 7.6″ · OLED · 120 Hz | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | 4,400 mAh · 25W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | — | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 wins narrowly over Philips S7221 — 7.3 overall against 6.6.
- Category by category it is split — 2 scored categories each, with 1 tied.
- Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,400 mAh.
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 gives you the larger screen — 7.6 inches against 6.7 inches.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 8.2Better | 5.5 |
| Battery | 6.6 | 7.8Better |
| Software | 7.4Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 5.6 | 7.2Better |
| Call Quality | 8.0Tie | 7.8Tie |
| Performance | — | 7.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
- Larger display (7.6″ vs 6.67″)
Philips S7221
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 4,400 mAh)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2023 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 13 with One UI 5.1.1 | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (1×3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 + 2×2.8 GHz A715 + 2×2.8 GHz A710 + 3×2.0 GHz A510) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 7.6″ | 6.67″ |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Display protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 (front & back) | — |
| Resolution | — | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 wins clearly on Display (8.2 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,400 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25W | 25W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Philips S7221 wins clearly on Battery (6.6 vs 7.8) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Colours | Cream, Icy Blue, Phantom Black, Gray (online), Blue (online) | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Dimensions | — | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | — | 210 g |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG capable | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 10 MP (f/2.2) · 4 MP (f/1.8) | 16 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 57.3Infinix Smart 20e5.3Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 57.3Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 57.3vivo Y6k5.5
- Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 57.3Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72216.6Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- Philips S7221 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scorePhilips S72216.6Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- Philips S7221 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72216.6Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72216.6vivo Y6k5.5Better for Display