Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro vs Philips S7210
Philips S7210 wins narrowly over Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro — 5.9 overall against 5.4. The Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro launched in 2017; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 2,600 mAh.
Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.

Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro
5.4/ 10 — Below average
≈ $248€220 · ≈ £184≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsOverall winner

Philips S7210
5.9/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm MSM8953-Pro Snapdragon 626 (14 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 5.2″ · OLED | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 2,600 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | 4GB / 64GB | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Philips S7210 wins narrowly over Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro — 5.9 overall against 5.4.
- Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro takes 3 of the 5 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 2,600 mAh.
- Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 5.2 inches.
- Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro is the lighter phone — 145 g against 203 g.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3.5 | 4.6Better |
| Display | 7.4Better | 5.2 |
| Battery | 3.5 | 8.2Better |
| Design & Build | 7.2 | — |
| Software | 6.6Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 6.5Better | 5.4 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro
- Lighter body (145 g vs 203 g)
Philips S7210
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 2,600 mAh)
- More storage (128 GB vs 64 GB)
- More RAM (8 GB vs 4 GB)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 5.2″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | Mar 2017 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 7.0 (Nougat) | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm MSM8953-Pro Snapdragon 626 (14 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 506 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Performance (3.5 vs 4.6) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 4 GB RAM + 64 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Card slot | Shared / hybrid slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 5.2″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 1,920 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Display protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 | — |
| Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro wins clearly on Display (7.4 vs 5.2) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,600 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (3.5 vs 8.2) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 145.7 × 71.4 × 7 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 145 g | 203 g |
| Materials | Glass, Aluminium | — |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Colours | — | Black, Titan |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 16 MP (f/1.9) | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 16 MP, f/1.9, AF | 8 MP |
| Connectivity · Radio | Stereo FM radio with RDS; recording | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro
- Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro vs Philips S7210Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy C5 Pro5.4Philips S72105.9Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro vs Philips S7221Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy C5 Pro5.4Philips S72215.7Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy C5 Pro5.4RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy C5 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy C5 Pro5.4ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72105.9Philips S72215.7
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Philips S7210 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72105.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display
