Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro — full specifications compared side by side. The Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 launched in 2020; the RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro in 2026. Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 gives you the larger screen — 165.1 inches against 6.7 inches.
Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20
$1,399≈ €1,242 · ≈ £1,036≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
6.9/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 | RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA, 2020, 64 bit, octa-core, 7 nm, ARM Mali-G57 GPU | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 (4 nm) |
| Display | 165.1″ · IPS LCD | 6.67″ · OLED · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP (f/2) |
| Battery | 18W charging | 9,300 mAh · 45W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 128GB | 12GB / 512GB |
Which is better?
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro takes 1 of the 2 categories both phones are scored in.
- Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 gives you the larger screen — 165.1 inches against 6.7 inches.
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro charges faster — 45W wired against 18W.
- Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 is the lighter phone — 175 g against 477 g.
Category scores
| Category | Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 | RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4.8 | 7.9Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Performance | — | 6.6 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Battery | — | 8.6 |
| Audio | — | 6.0 |
| Call Quality | — | 6.3 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20
- Larger display (165.1″ vs 6.67″)
- Lighter body (175 g vs 477 g)
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
- More storage (512 GB vs 128 GB)
- Faster charging (45W vs 18W)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 | RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2020 | Sep 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Google Android 10 (Q) | Android 16, up to 3 major OS updates |
| Chipset (as published) | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA, 2020, 64 bit, octa-core, 7 nm, ARM Mali-G57 GPU | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 (4 nm) |
| CPU | 2000.0 MHz | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) |
| GPU | ARM Mali-G57MP3 | G720 MC7 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 128 GB | 12 GB RAM + 512 GB |
| Card slot | None | None |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 165.1″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,400 pixels | 1,220 × 2,712 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | OLED |
| Display protection | Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1,700 nits |
| RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Display (4.8 vs 7.9) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Wired charging | 18W | 45W |
| Battery capacity | — | 9,300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Body & build | ||
| Weight | 175 g | 477 g |
| Dimensions | — | 172.5 × 83.4 × 19.1 mm |
| Colours | — | Black, Sand Dune |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| USB | USB C reversible; USB charging , USB fast charging , USB Host , USB OTG 1.3 , USB PD | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| Positioning | — | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 8 MP | 32 MP wide (f/2.5, 0.7µm) |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, 1µm) · 64 MP (f/2) · 5 MP ultrawide (f/2.4, 1/2.7") |
| Video (max) | — | 4K@30/60fps |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Barometer |
| Fingerprint | — | Optical (under-display) |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | EIS , EIS (video) , Pixel unification , HDR photo , HDR video , Slow motion video , Burst mode , Touch focus , Panorama Photo , Face detection , Face tagging , Smile detection , Face retouch , Intelligent scene detection | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 8.0 MP | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.7µm |
Popular comparisons for Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20
- Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 vs Philips S7210Better for Display
- Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 vs Philips S7221Better for Display
- Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Display
- Oppo A72 5G 2020 Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 128GB PDYM20 vs Samsung Galaxy A58
Popular comparisons for RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs Philips S7210Overall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Philips S72105.9
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs Philips S7221Overall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Philips S72215.7
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs vivo V80 FEOverall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Cameras