Nokia C200 vs vivo V80 FE
vivo V80 FE wins clearly over Nokia C200 — 6.9 overall against 4.7. vivo V80 FE has the bigger battery — 7,000 mAh against 4,000 mAh.
vivo V80 FE: Based on announced specs — scored in 8 categories.
Nokia C200
4.7/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsOverall winner
vivo V80 FE
6.9/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Nokia C200 | vivo V80 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Turbo (4 nm) |
| Display | 6.09″ · IPS LCD | 6.59″ · OLED · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56") |
| Battery | 4,000 mAh · 10W charging | 7,000 mAh · 90W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 3GB / 32GB | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- vivo V80 FE wins clearly over Nokia C200 — 6.9 overall against 4.7.
- vivo V80 FE takes 5 of the 7 categories both phones are scored in.
- vivo V80 FE has the bigger battery — 7,000 mAh against 4,000 mAh.
- vivo V80 FE gives you the larger screen — 6.6 inches against 6.1 inches.
- On paper, vivo V80 FE has the higher-resolution main camera — 50 MP against 13 MP.
Category scores
| Category | Nokia C200 | vivo V80 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 3.1 | 6.1Better |
| Camera | 4.0 | 6.5Better |
| Display | 5.2 | 8.0Better |
| Battery | 5.5 | 8.8Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5 | 6.9Better |
| Call Quality | 6.2Tie | 6.2Tie |
| Design & Build | — | 6.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Nokia C200
- Lighter body (173 g vs 201 g)
vivo V80 FE
- Faster charging (90W vs 10W)
- More storage (256 GB vs 32 GB)
- Higher-resolution main camera (50 MP vs 13 MP)
- More RAM (8 GB vs 3 GB)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Nokia C200 | vivo V80 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Announced |
| Release date | 5 Jan 2022 | — |
| Expected release window | — | 3 Nov 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 12 | Android 17, OriginOS 7 |
| Chipset | Helio A22 | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 Turbo (4 nm) |
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Performance (3.1 vs 6.1) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 3 GB RAM + 32 GB | 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | None |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.09″ | 6.59″ |
| Resolution | 720 × 1,560 pixels | 1,260 × 2,750 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | OLED |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3,000 nits |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Display (5.2 vs 8.0) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10W | 90W |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Battery (5.5 vs 8.8) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 156.5 × 73.1 × 8.8 mm | 157.8 × 74.5 × 7.8 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 201 g |
| Colours | Meteor Black | Chill Green, Sparkling Gold |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Materials | — | Glass, Plastic |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity, Barometer | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass |
| Fingerprint | — | Optical (under-display) |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 3G, 4G | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 13 MP | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, OIS, 1/1.56") · 50 MP ultrawide (f/2.1) |
| Front cameras | 8 MP | 50 MP wide (f/2) |
| Video (max) | 1080p@30fps | 4K |
| vivo V80 FE wins clearly on Camera (4.0 vs 6.5) | ||
| Additional specifications | ||
| Network · Bands 2g | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| Network · Bands 3g | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| Network · Bands 4g | 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 20, 25, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| Network · Speed | HSPA, LTE (2CA) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash | Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera · Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 8 MP | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF |
| Selfie Camera · Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K, 1080p |
| Connectivity · Radio | FM radio | No |
Popular comparisons for Nokia C200
- Nokia C200 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreNokia C2004.7ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Nokia C200 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scoreNokia C2004.7vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Battery life
- Nokia C200 vs Karbonn Rebel ProOverall scoreNokia C2004.7Karbonn Rebel Pro5.8Better for Battery life
- Nokia C200 vs Karbonn RebelOverall scoreNokia C2004.7Karbonn Rebel5.7Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for vivo V80 FE
- vivo V80 FE vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- vivo V80 FE vs Karbonn Rebel ProOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9Karbonn Rebel Pro5.8
- vivo V80 FE vs Karbonn RebelOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9Karbonn Rebel5.7
- vivo V80 FE vs Xiaomi Redmi M100 ProOverall scorevivo V80 FE6.9Xiaomi Redmi M100 Pro7.1Better for Design