Nokia 1650 vs Philips S7210
Nokia 1650 vs Philips S7210 — full specifications compared side by side. The Nokia 1650 launched in 2008; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 1,020 mAh.
Nokia 1650: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Philips S7210
5.9/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Nokia 1650 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 1.8″ | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 1,020 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | — | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Philips S7210 takes 3 of the 3 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 1,020 mAh.
- Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 1.8 inches.
- Nokia 1650 is the lighter phone — 80 g against 203 g.
Category scores
| Category | Nokia 1650 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 3.4 | 5.2Better |
| Battery | 2.2 | 8.2Better |
| Audio | 4.6 | 5.4Better |
| Performance | — | 4.6 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Software | — | 6.0 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Nokia 1650
- Lighter body (80 g vs 203 g)
Philips S7210
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 1,020 mAh)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 1.8″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Nokia 1650 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Discontinued | Available |
| Release date | Jan 2008 | Jun 2026 |
| Memory | ||
| Card slot | None | — |
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 1.8″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 128 × 160 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | — | IPS LCD |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Display (3.4 vs 5.2) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,020 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (2.2 vs 8.2) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 104.2 × 43.8 × 17.8 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 80 g | 203 g |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Colours | — | Black, Titan |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | None | — |
| USB | No | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| NFC | — | No |
| Positioning | — | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Platform | ||
| OS | — | Android |
| OS version | — | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | — | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | — | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | — | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Front cameras | — | 8 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Connectivity · Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for Nokia 1650
- Nokia 1650 vs Philips S7210Better for Battery life
- Nokia 1650 vs Philips S7221Better for Battery life
- Nokia 1650 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Battery life
- Nokia 1650 vs Samsung Galaxy A58
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72105.9Philips S72215.7
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Philips S7210 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72105.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display