Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly over Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 — 6.9 overall against 4.6. The Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 launched in 2011; the RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro in 2026. RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro has the bigger battery — 9,300 mAh against 3,960 mAh.
Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608
4.6/ 10 — Below average
≈ $237€210 · ≈ £175≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsOverall winner
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
6.9/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 | RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | TI OMAP 4430 | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 (4 nm) |
| Display | 8.2″ · LCD (other) | 6.67″ · OLED · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP (f/2) |
| Battery | 3,960 mAh | 9,300 mAh · 45W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 1GB / 16GB | 12GB / 512GB |
Which is better?
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly over Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 — 6.9 overall against 4.6.
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro takes 3 of the 5 categories both phones are scored in.
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro has the bigger battery — 9,300 mAh against 3,960 mAh.
- Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 gives you the larger screen — 8.2 inches against 6.7 inches.
- Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 is the lighter phone — 386 g against 477 g.
Category scores
| Category | Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 | RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2.0 | 6.6Better |
| Display | 4.9 | 7.9Better |
| Battery | 6.0 | 8.6Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 7.3Better | 6.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Call Quality | — | 6.3 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608
- Lighter body (386 g vs 477 g)
- Larger display (8.2″ vs 6.67″)
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
- More storage (512 GB vs 16 GB)
- More RAM (12 GB vs 1 GB)
- Bigger battery (9,300 mAh vs 3,960 mAh)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 | RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Discontinued | Available |
| Release date | Dec 2011 | Sep 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 3.2 (Honeycomb), upgradable to 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) | Android 16, up to 3 major OS updates |
| Chipset (as published) | TI OMAP 4430 | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Dual-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9 | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) |
| GPU | PowerVR SGX540 | G720 MC7 |
| RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Performance (2.0 vs 6.6) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 1 GB RAM + 16 GB | 12 GB RAM + 512 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | None |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 8.2″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 800 × 1,280 pixels | 1,220 × 2,712 pixels |
| Panel type | LCD (other) | OLED |
| Display protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1,700 nits |
| RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Display (4.9 vs 7.9) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,960 mAh | 9,300 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 45W |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Battery (6.0 vs 8.6) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 216 × 139 × 9 mm | 172.5 × 83.4 × 19.1 mm |
| Weight | 386 g | 477 g |
| SIM | Mini-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Colours | — | Black, Sand Dune |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| NFC | — | Yes |
| Audio | ||
| Loudspeaker | Stereo | — |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 5 MP | 32 MP wide (f/2.5, 0.7µm) |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, 1µm) · 64 MP (f/2) · 5 MP ultrawide (f/2.4, 1/2.7") |
| Video (max) | — | 4K@30/60fps |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Barometer |
| Fingerprint | — | Optical (under-display) |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 5 MP, AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Wireless FM radio |
Popular comparisons for Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608
- Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreMotorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ6084.6Philips S72105.9Better for Gaming
- Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 vs Philips S7221Overall scoreMotorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ6084.6Philips S72215.7Better for Gaming
- Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreMotorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ6084.6RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Gaming
- Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ608 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreMotorola XOOM 2 Media Edition 3G MZ6084.6ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
Popular comparisons for RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs Philips S7210Overall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Philips S72105.9
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs Philips S7221Overall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Philips S72215.7
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs vivo V80 FEOverall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Cameras