Motorola Moto E13 vs Philips S7210
Philips S7210 wins narrowly over Motorola Moto E13 — 5.9 overall against 5.3. The Motorola Moto E13 launched in 2023; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 5,000 mAh.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Motorola Moto E13
5.3/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsOverall winner
Philips S7210
5.9/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Motorola Moto E13 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.5″ · IPS LCD | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | 13 MP wide (f/2.2, 1.12µm) | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh · 10W charging | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | 8GB / 128GB | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Philips S7210 wins narrowly over Motorola Moto E13 — 5.9 overall against 5.3.
- Philips S7210 takes 3 of the 7 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 5,000 mAh.
- Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 6.5 inches.
- On paper, Philips S7210 has the higher-resolution main camera — 50 MP against 13 MP.
Category scores
| Category | Motorola Moto E13 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 4.3Tie | 4.6Tie |
| Camera | 4.0 | 5.7Better |
| Display | 5.2Tie | 5.2Tie |
| Battery | 6.6 | 8.2Better |
| Design & Build | 6.2 | — |
| Software | 6.0Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5Better | 5.4 |
| Call Quality | 6.2 | 7.2Better |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Motorola Moto E13
- Lighter body (180 g vs 203 g)
Philips S7210
- Higher-resolution main camera (50 MP vs 13 MP)
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 6.5″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Motorola Moto E13 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 13 Feb 2023 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 16 |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 2 GB RAM + 32 GB · 2 GB RAM + 64 GB · 4 GB RAM + 64 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.5″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 720 × 1,600 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 10W | — |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (6.6 vs 8.2) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 164.2 × 75 × 8.5 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 203 g |
| Materials | Glass, Plastic | — |
| Colours | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green | Black, Titan |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity | — |
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 3G, 4G | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 13 MP wide (f/2.2, 1.12µm) | 50 MP |
| Front cameras | 5 MP wide (f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm) | 8 MP |
| Video (max) | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Camera (4.0 vs 5.7) | ||
| Additional specifications | ||
| Network · Bands 2g | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| Network · Bands 3g | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| Network · Bands 4g | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Network · Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Main Camera · Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP |
| Selfie Camera · Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Connectivity · Radio | FM radio, recording | Unspecified |
| Misc · Price | About 130 EUR | About 150 EUR |
Popular comparisons for Motorola Moto E13
- Motorola Moto E13 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreMotorola Moto E135.3Philips S72105.9Better for Cameras
- Motorola Moto E13 vs Philips S7221Overall scoreMotorola Moto E135.3Philips S72215.7Better for Cameras
- Motorola Moto E13 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreMotorola Moto E135.3RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Motorola Moto E13 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreMotorola Moto E135.3ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72105.9Philips S72215.7
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Philips S7210 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72105.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display