Lava Z80 vs Philips S7210
Philips S7210 wins clearly over Lava Z80 — 5.9 overall against 4.3. The Lava Z80 launched in 2017; the Philips S7210 in 2026. Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 2,500 mAh.
Lava Z80: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.

Lava Z80
4.3/ 10 — Below average
≈ $95≈ €84 · ≈ £70≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsOverall winner

Philips S7210
5.9/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Lava Z80 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Mediatek MT6737 (28 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 5″ · IPS LCD | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 2,500 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | 3GB / 16GB | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Philips S7210 wins clearly over Lava Z80 — 5.9 overall against 4.3.
- Philips S7210 takes 2 of the 5 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7210 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 2,500 mAh.
- Philips S7210 gives you the larger screen — 6.8 inches against 5.0 inches.
- Lava Z80 is the lighter phone — 137 g against 203 g.
Category scores
| Category | Lava Z80 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2.8 | 4.6Better |
| Display | 5.2Tie | 5.2Tie |
| Battery | 3.5 | 8.2Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5Better | 5.4 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Lava Z80
- Lighter body (137 g vs 203 g)
Philips S7210
- More storage (128 GB vs 16 GB)
- More RAM (8 GB vs 3 GB)
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 2,500 mAh)
- Larger display (6.75″ vs 5″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Lava Z80 | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | Sep 2017 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 7.0 (Nougat) | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Mediatek MT6737 (28 nm) | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-T720MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Performance (2.8 vs 4.6) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 3 GB RAM + 16 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Card slot | Shared / hybrid slot | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 5″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 720 × 1,280 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,500 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Philips S7210 wins clearly on Battery (3.5 vs 8.2) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 148.5 × 73.1 × 8.1 mm | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Weight | 137 g | 203 g |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Micro-SIM/Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Colours | — | Black, Titan |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4 | — |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 8 MP (f/2) | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP |
| Connectivity · Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
Popular comparisons for Lava Z80
- Lava Z80 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreLava Z804.3Philips S72105.9Better for Battery life
- Lava Z80 vs Philips S7221Overall scoreLava Z804.3Philips S72215.7Better for Battery life
- Lava Z80 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreLava Z804.3RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Battery life
- Lava Z80 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreLava Z804.3ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72105.9Philips S72215.7
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Philips S7210 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72105.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display
