iPhone 17 vs Philips S7221
iPhone 17 wins narrowly over Philips S7221 — 7.2 overall against 6.6. The iPhone 17 launched in 2025; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 3,500 mAh.
iPhone 17: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner

iPhone 17
7.2/ 10 — Good
$1,099≈ €984 · ≈ £821≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
6.6/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | iPhone 17 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.1″ · OLED | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | 3,500 mAh · 35W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | — | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- iPhone 17 wins narrowly over Philips S7221 — 7.2 overall against 6.6.
- iPhone 17 takes 4 of the 6 categories both phones are scored in.
- Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 3,500 mAh.
- Philips S7221 gives you the larger screen — 6.7 inches against 6.1 inches.
- iPhone 17 charges faster — 35W wired against 25W.
Category scores
| Category | iPhone 17 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 7.7Better | 7.0 |
| Display | 8.0Better | 5.5 |
| Battery | 6.1 | 7.8Better |
| Software | 6.9Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 5.6 | 7.2Better |
| Call Quality | 8.8Better | 7.8 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
iPhone 17
- Faster charging (35W vs 25W)
Philips S7221
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 3,500 mAh)
- Larger display (6.67″ vs 6.1″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | iPhone 17 | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2025 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | iOS | Android |
| OS version | iOS 19 | Android 16 |
| Chipset | Apple A19 Pro | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Apple A19 Pro | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Hexa-core | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Apple GPU 6-core | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| iPhone 17 wins narrowly on Performance (7.7 vs 7.0) | ||
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.1″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 1,200 × 2,600 pixels | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Display protection | Ceramic Shield glass 2 | — |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| iPhone 17 wins clearly on Display (8.0 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,500 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 35W | 25W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Philips S7221 wins clearly on Battery (6.1 vs 7.8) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 146.2 × 70.5 × 7.7 mm | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | — |
| Colours | Black Titanium, Silver Titanium, Blue Titanium, Natural Titanium, Product Red | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Weight | — | 210 g |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 4 / Thunderbolt | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Barometer | — |
| Face unlock | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 12 MP (f/1.9) | 16 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
| Main Camera · Features | OIS, AF, Dual Pixel PDAF, HDR, LED Flash, Cinematic Mode | LED flash |
Popular comparisons for iPhone 17
- iPhone 17 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreiPhone 177.2Coolpad Cool X Wide5.3
- iPhone 17 vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreiPhone 177.2vivo Y6k5.1
- iPhone 17 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreiPhone 177.2Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- iPhone 17 vs Philips S7221Overall scoreiPhone 177.2Philips S72216.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72216.6Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- Philips S7221 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72216.6Coolpad Cool X Wide5.3
- Philips S7221 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72216.6vivo Y6k5.1
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72216.6RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro7.5Better for Display
