HTC Desire 520 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly over HTC Desire 520 — 6.9 overall against 4.0. The HTC Desire 520 launched in 2015; the RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro in 2026. RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro has the bigger battery — 9,300 mAh against 2,000 mAh.
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
HTC Desire 520
4.0/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsOverall winner
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
6.9/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | HTC Desire 520 | RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 (28 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 (4 nm) |
| Display | 4.5″ · IPS LCD | 6.67″ · OLED · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 64 MP (f/2) |
| Battery | 2,000 mAh | 9,300 mAh · 45W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 1GB / 8GB | 12GB / 512GB |
Which is better?
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly over HTC Desire 520 — 6.9 overall against 4.0.
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro takes 4 of the 7 categories both phones are scored in.
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro has the bigger battery — 9,300 mAh against 2,000 mAh.
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro gives you the larger screen — 6.7 inches against 4.5 inches.
- On paper, RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro has the higher-resolution main camera — 64 MP against 8 MP.
Category scores
| Category | HTC Desire 520 | RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | 2.4 | 6.6Better |
| Camera | 3.5 | 5.9Better |
| Display | 4.6 | 7.9Better |
| Battery | 3.4 | 8.6Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 6.5Better | 6.0 |
| Call Quality | 6.2Tie | 6.3Tie |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
- More storage (512 GB vs 8 GB)
- More RAM (12 GB vs 1 GB)
- Higher-resolution main camera (64 MP vs 8 MP)
- Bigger battery (9,300 mAh vs 2,000 mAh)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | HTC Desire 520 | RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Discontinued | Available |
| Release date | Nov 2015 | Sep 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 5.1 (Lollipop), Sense 7 UI | Android 16, up to 3 major OS updates |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 210 | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 (28 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8400 (4 nm) |
| CPU | Quad-core 1.1 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) |
| GPU | Adreno 304 | G720 MC7 |
| RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Performance (2.4 vs 6.6) | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 1 GB RAM + 8 GB | 12 GB RAM + 512 GB |
| Card slot | Dedicated slot | None |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 4.5″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 480 × 854 pixels | 1,220 × 2,712 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | OLED |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1,700 nits |
| Display protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Display (4.6 vs 7.9) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,000 mAh | 9,300 mAh |
| Wired charging | — | 45W |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Battery (3.4 vs 8.6) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Dimensions | 139.8 × 68.9 × 9.1 mm | 172.5 × 83.4 × 19.1 mm |
| Colours | Slate Gray | Black, Sand Dune |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | — | 477 g |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Proximity | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Barometer |
| Fingerprint | — | Optical (under-display) |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | 2G, 3G, 4G | 2G, 3G, 4G |
| Camera | ||
| Rear cameras | 8 MP | 50 MP wide (f/1.9, 1µm) · 64 MP (f/2) · 5 MP ultrawide (f/2.4, 1/2.7") |
| Front cameras | 2 MP | 32 MP wide (f/2.5, 0.7µm) |
| Video (max) | 720p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps |
| RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro wins clearly on Camera (3.5 vs 5.9) | ||
| Additional specifications | ||
| Network · Bands 2g | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| Network · Bands 3g | HSDPA 850 / 1900 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| Network · Bands 4g | 2, 4, 5, 17 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Network · Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Main Camera · Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Main Camera · Video | 720p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1440p@30/60fps |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 2 MP | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Selfie Camera · Video | 720p | 1080p@30fps |
| Connectivity · Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio |
Popular comparisons for HTC Desire 520
- HTC Desire 520 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreHTC Desire 5204Philips S72105.9Better for Battery life
- HTC Desire 520 vs Philips S7221Overall scoreHTC Desire 5204Philips S72215.7Better for Battery life
- HTC Desire 520 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreHTC Desire 5204RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Battery life
- HTC Desire 520 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreHTC Desire 5204ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs Philips S7210Overall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Philips S72105.9
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs Philips S7221Overall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Philips S72215.7
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro vs vivo V80 FEOverall scoreRugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Cameras