Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Philips S7221
Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Philips S7221 is too close to call — 6.5 overall against 6.6. The Google Pixel 9 Pro launched in 2024; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 700 mAh.
Google Pixel 9 Pro: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Google Pixel 9 Pro
6.5/ 10 — Average
$999≈ €895 · ≈ £746≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
6.6/ 10 — Average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Google Pixel 9 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.3″ · OLED · 120 Hz | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | 700 mAh · 45W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | — | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Philips S7221 is too close to call — 6.5 overall against 6.6.
- Category by category it is split — 2 scored categories each, with 0 tied.
- Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 700 mAh.
- Philips S7221 gives you the larger screen — 6.7 inches against 6.3 inches.
- Google Pixel 9 Pro charges faster — 45W wired against 25W.
Category scores
| Category | Google Pixel 9 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 8.5Better | 5.5 |
| Battery | 3.7 | 7.8Better |
| Software | 8.1Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 5.6 | 7.2Better |
| Performance | — | 7.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Google Pixel 9 Pro
- Faster charging (45W vs 25W)
Philips S7221
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 700 mAh)
- Larger display (6.67″ vs 6.3″)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2024 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 14; upgradable to Android 15, with 7 years of updates | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (1×3.1 GHz Cortex-X4, 3×2.6 GHz Cortex-A720, 4×1.92 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Mali-G715 MC7 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.3″ | 6.67″ |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Brightness (peak) | 3,000 nits | — |
| Display protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | — |
| Resolution | — | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Google Pixel 9 Pro wins clearly on Display (8.5 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 700 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45W | 25W |
| Wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Philips S7221 wins clearly on Battery (3.7 vs 7.8) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| IP rating | IP68 | — |
| Colours | Obsidian, Porcelain, Hazel, Rose Quartz | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Dimensions | — | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | — | 210 g |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 (with DisplayPort support) | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Compass, Barometer | — |
| Face unlock | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 42 MP ultrawide (f/2.2) | 16 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
| Main Camera · Features | OIS, Laser AF, Dual Pixel PDAF, Night Mode | LED flash |
Popular comparisons for Google Pixel 9 Pro
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreGoogle Pixel 9 Pro6.5Coolpad Cool X Wide5.3
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs vivo Y6kOverall scoreGoogle Pixel 9 Pro6.5vivo Y6k5.1
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Philips S7210Overall scoreGoogle Pixel 9 Pro6.5Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Philips S7221Overall scoreGoogle Pixel 9 Pro6.5Philips S72216.6Better for Battery life
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72216.6Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- Philips S7221 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72216.6Coolpad Cool X Wide5.3
- Philips S7221 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72216.6vivo Y6k5.1
- Philips S7221 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72216.6RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro7.5Better for Display