BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN vs Philips S7210
BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN vs Philips S7210 — full specifications compared side by side. The BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN launched in 2017; the Philips S7210 in 2026. BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN gives you the larger screen — 139.7 inches against 6.8 inches.
BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7210: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & details
Philips S7210
5.9/ 10 — Below average
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917, 2016, 64 bit, quad-core, 512 Kbyte L2, 28 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 308 GPU | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| Display | 139.7″ · IPS LCD | 6.75″ · IPS LCD |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | — | 5,700 mAh |
| RAM / Storage | 32GB | 4GB / 128GB |
Which is better?
- Philips S7210 takes 1 of the 2 categories both phones are scored in.
- BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN gives you the larger screen — 139.7 inches against 6.8 inches.
- BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN is the lighter phone — 157 g against 203 g.
Category scores
| Category | BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4.6 | 5.2Better |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Performance | — | 4.6 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Battery | — | 8.2 |
| Audio | — | 5.4 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.2 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN
- Larger display (139.7″ vs 6.75″)
- Lighter body (157 g vs 203 g)
Philips S7210
- More storage (128 GB vs 32 GB)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN | Philips S7210 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2017 | Jun 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Google Android 7.1 (Nougat) | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917, 2016, 64 bit, quad-core, 512 Kbyte L2, 28 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 308 GPU | Unisoc T765 (6 nm) |
| CPU | 1400.0 MHz | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 308 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 32 GB | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 139.7″ | 6.75″ |
| Resolution | 720 × 1,280 pixels | 720 × 1,612 pixels |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Display protection | Yes | — |
| Philips S7210 wins narrowly on Display (4.6 vs 5.2) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Weight | 157 g | 203 g |
| Dimensions | — | 168 × 77.5 × 8.6 mm |
| Colours | — | Black, Titan |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 | — |
| USB | USB Micro-AB; USB charging , USB Host , USB OTG 1.3 , USB PD | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| NFC | — | No |
| Positioning | — | GPS |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 4.9 MP | 8 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | — | 5,700 mAh |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
| Features | ||
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | HDR photo , Slow motion video , Touch focus , Macro mode , Panorama Photo , Face detection , Face tagging , Smile detection , Face retouch | LED flash |
| Selfie Camera · Single | 4.9 MP | 8 MP |
Popular comparisons for BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN
- BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN vs Philips S7210Better for Display
- BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN vs Philips S7221Better for Display
- BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Display
- BBK Vivo Y66i Dual SIM TD-LTE CN vs Samsung Galaxy A58
Popular comparisons for Philips S7210
- Philips S7210 vs Philips S7221Overall scorePhilips S72105.9Philips S72215.7
- Philips S7210 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9Better for Display
- Philips S7210 vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 ProOverall scorePhilips S72105.9ZTE nubia RedMagic 12 Pro7.6Better for Gaming
- Philips S7210 vs vivo V80 FEOverall scorePhilips S72105.9vivo V80 FE6.9Better for Display