BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A vs Samsung Galaxy A58
BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A vs Samsung Galaxy A58 — full specifications compared side by side. Samsung Galaxy A58 charges faster — 45W wired against 10W.
One of these devices is still rumored — its specs are not official yet and may change before launch.
BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Samsung Galaxy A58: Based on announced specs — scored in 2 categories.
BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A
$799≈ €709 · ≈ £592≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 MT6771WT, 2018, 64 bit, octa-core, 2048 Kbyte L2, 12 nm, ARM Mali-G72 GPU | — |
| Display | 165.35″ · IPS LCD | — |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP wide |
| Battery | 10W charging | 45W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 64GB | — |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy A58 charges faster — 45W wired against 10W.
Category scores
| Category | BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4.6 | — |
| Software | 5.8 | — |
| Camera | — | 6.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung Galaxy A58
- Faster charging (45W vs 10W)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Rumored |
| Release date | 2022 | — |
| Expected release window | — | Mar 2027 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | — |
| OS version | Google Android 11 (R) | — |
| Chipset (as published) | MediaTek Helio P70 MT6771WT, 2018, 64 bit, octa-core, 2048 Kbyte L2, 12 nm, ARM Mali-G72 GPU | — |
| CPU | 2100.0 MHz | — |
| GPU | ARM Mali-G72MP3 | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 64 GB | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 165.35″ | — |
| Resolution | 720 × 1,600 pixels | — |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | — |
| Display protection | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Wired charging | 10W | 45W |
| Body & build | ||
| Weight | 179 g | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 | — |
| USB | USB Micro-AB; USB charging , USB Host , USB OTG 1.3 , USB OTG 2.0 | — |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP wide · 12 MP ultrawide · 5 MP macro |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Selfie Camera · Single | 8.0 MP | 12 MP |
Popular comparisons for BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A
- BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A vs Philips S7210Better for Display
- BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A vs Philips S7221Better for Display
- BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Display
- BBK vivo Y32t 2022 4G Standard Edition Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 64GB V2168A vs Samsung Galaxy A58