BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A vs Samsung Galaxy A58
BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A vs Samsung Galaxy A58 — full specifications compared side by side. Samsung Galaxy A58 charges faster — 45W wired against 33W.
One of these devices is still rumored — its specs are not official yet and may change before launch.
BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Samsung Galaxy A58: Based on announced specs — scored in 2 categories.
BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G SM7250-AB (Lito), 2020, 64 bit, octa-core, 7 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 620 GPU | — |
| Display | 166.62″ · OLED | — |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP wide |
| Battery | 33W charging | 45W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 256GB | — |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy A58 charges faster — 45W wired against 33W.
Category scores
| Category | BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 5.6 | — |
| Software | 5.8 | — |
| Camera | — | 6.7 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Samsung Galaxy A58
- Faster charging (45W vs 33W)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A | Samsung Galaxy A58 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Rumored |
| Release date | 2020 | — |
| Expected release window | — | Mar 2027 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | — |
| OS version | Google Android 10 (Q) | — |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 5G SM7250-AB (Lito), 2020, 64 bit, octa-core, 7 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 620 GPU | — |
| CPU | 2400.0 MHz | — |
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 620 | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 256 GB | — |
| Card slot | None | — |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 166.62″ | — |
| Resolution | 1,080 × 2,376 pixels | — |
| Panel type | OLED | — |
| Display protection | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Wired charging | 33W | 45W |
| Body & build | ||
| Weight | 182 g | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1 | — |
| USB | USB C reversible; USB charging , USB fast charging , USB Host , USB OTG 1.3 , USB OTG 2.0 , USB PD , USB PD 2.0 | — |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 32 MP | 12 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP wide · 12 MP ultrawide · 5 MP macro |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Selfie Camera · Single | 32.0 MP | 12 MP |
Popular comparisons for BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A
- BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A vs Philips S7210
- BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A vs Philips S7221
- BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Display
- BBK Vivo X50 Pro 5G Dual SIM TD-LTE CN 256GB V2005A vs Samsung Galaxy A58