Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Philips S7221
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Philips S7221 is too close to call — 6.4 overall against 6.6. The Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro launched in 2025; the Philips S7221 in 2026. Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,350 mAh.
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
6.4/ 10 — Average
$600≈ €535 · ≈ £447≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
6.6/ 10 — Average
≈ $208≈ €185 · ≈ £155≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.6″ · LCD (other) · 120 Hz | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | 4,350 mAh · 15W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | — | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Philips S7221 is too close to call — 6.4 overall against 6.6.
- Category by category it is split — 2 scored categories each, with 0 tied.
- Philips S7221 has the bigger battery — 5,700 mAh against 4,350 mAh.
- Philips S7221 charges faster — 25W wired against 15W.
Category scores
| Category | Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 6.6Better | 5.5 |
| Battery | 5.9 | 7.8Better |
| Software | 7.4Better | 6.0 |
| Audio | 5.6 | 7.2Better |
| Performance | — | 7.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Philips S7221
- Faster charging (25W vs 15W)
- Bigger battery (5,700 mAh vs 4,350 mAh)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2025 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core (1×2.5 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3×2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4×1.8 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.6″ | 6.67″ |
| Panel type | LCD (other) | IPS LCD |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Display protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Resolution | — | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro wins clearly on Display (6.6 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,350 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 15W | 25W |
| Philips S7221 wins clearly on Battery (5.9 vs 7.8) | ||
| Body & build | ||
| Colours | Black | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Dimensions | — | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | — | 210 g |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, version 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass | — |
| Fingerprint | Side-mounted | Side-mounted |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 13 MP (f/2.2) | 16 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Connectivity · Radio | No | Unspecified |
| Main Camera · Features | HDR, Panorama, Dual LED Flash, 4K Video | LED flash |
Popular comparisons for Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro
- Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Infinix Smart 20 HDOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro6.4Infinix Smart 20 HD5.1Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Honor Choice T10Overall scoreSamsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro6.4Honor Choice T105.2Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro6.4Infinix Smart 20e5.3Better for Battery life
- Samsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scoreSamsung Galaxy XCover7 Pro6.4Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72216.6Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- Philips S7221 vs Infinix Smart 20 HDOverall scorePhilips S72216.6Infinix Smart 20 HD5.1
- Philips S7221 vs Honor Choice T10Overall scorePhilips S72216.6Honor Choice T105.2
- Philips S7221 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scorePhilips S72216.6Infinix Smart 20e5.3