POCO F7 Pro vs Philips S7221
POCO F7 Pro wins narrowly over Philips S7221 — 6.9 overall against 6.6. The POCO F7 Pro launched in 2025; the Philips S7221 in 2026. POCO F7 Pro charges faster — 90W wired against 25W.
POCO F7 Pro: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Philips S7221: Limited confirmed specifications — categories without real data are not scored.
Overall winner

POCO F7 Pro
6.9/ 10 — Average
$629≈ €562 · ≈ £469≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & details
Philips S7221
6.6/ 10 — Average
≈ $208≈ €185 · ≈ £155≈ converted at today's rate · Buy on Amazon
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | POCO F7 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| Display | 6.67″ · OLED | 6.67″ · IPS LCD · 120 Hz |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP |
| Battery | 90W charging | 5,700 mAh · 25W charging |
| RAM / Storage | — | 8GB / 256GB |
Which is better?
- POCO F7 Pro wins narrowly over Philips S7221 — 6.9 overall against 6.6.
- POCO F7 Pro takes 2 of the 4 categories both phones are scored in.
- POCO F7 Pro charges faster — 90W wired against 25W.
Category scores
| Category | POCO F7 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 7.2Better | 5.5 |
| Software | 6.0Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Audio | 5.6 | 7.2Better |
| Call Quality | 8.8Better | 7.8 |
| Performance | — | 7.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.9 |
| Battery | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
POCO F7 Pro
- Faster charging (90W vs 25W)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | POCO F7 Pro | Philips S7221 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Available |
| Release date | 2025 | 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Android 15 (with HyperOS/POCO UI) | Android 16 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) | Unisoc T8200 (6 nm) |
| CPU | Octa-core — 1×3.3GHz Cortex-X4 + 3×3.2GHz A720 + 2×3.0GHz A720 + 2×2.3GHz A520 | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 6.67″ | 6.67″ |
| Panel type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Display protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | — |
| Resolution | — | 720 × 1,600 pixels |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| POCO F7 Pro wins clearly on Display (7.2 vs 5.5) | ||
| Battery | ||
| Wired charging | 90W | 25W |
| Battery capacity | — | 5,700 mAh |
| Body & build | ||
| Colours | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Dimensions | — | 166 × 77 × 9 mm |
| Weight | — | 210 g |
| SIM | — | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Audio | ||
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | — | Stereo |
| Features | ||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass | — |
| Face unlock | Yes | — |
| Fingerprint | — | Side-mounted |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Rear cameras | — | 64 MP |
| Video (max) | — | Yes |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | — | 4 GB RAM + 128 GB · 6 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 128 GB · 8 GB RAM + 256 GB |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G |
| Additional specifications | ||
| Main Camera · Features | OIS, HDR, Panorama | LED flash |
Popular comparisons for POCO F7 Pro
- POCO F7 Pro vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scorePOCO F7 Pro6.9Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- POCO F7 Pro vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePOCO F7 Pro6.9Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1
- POCO F7 Pro vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePOCO F7 Pro6.9vivo Y6k5.5
- POCO F7 Pro vs Philips S7210Overall scorePOCO F7 Pro6.9Philips S72106.5
Popular comparisons for Philips S7221
- Philips S7221 vs Philips S7210Overall scorePhilips S72216.6Philips S72106.5Better for Battery life
- Philips S7221 vs Infinix Smart 20eOverall scorePhilips S72216.6Infinix Smart 20e5.3
- Philips S7221 vs Coolpad Cool X WideOverall scorePhilips S72216.6Coolpad Cool X Wide6.1Better for Gaming
- Philips S7221 vs vivo Y6kOverall scorePhilips S72216.6vivo Y6k5.5Better for Display
