Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933 vs Oppo Reno17
Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933 vs Oppo Reno17 — full specifications compared side by side. Oppo Reno17 charges faster — 80W wired against 10W.
One of these devices is still rumored — its specs are not official yet and may change before launch.
Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933: Specifications are still being confirmed — scores appear as data is verified.
Oppo Reno17: Based on announced specs — scored in 5 categories.
Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933
Check price on Amazon.com · Amazon.de · Amazon.co.uk
Full specs & detailsKey highlights
| Highlight | Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933 | Oppo Reno17 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 (Trinket), 2019, 64 bit, octa-core, 11 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 610 GPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| Display | 165.1″ · IPS LCD | — |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP |
| Battery | 10W charging | 7,000 mAh · 80W charging |
| RAM / Storage | 128GB | 12GB / 512GB |
Which is better?
- Category by category it is split — 0 scored categories each, with 1 tied.
- Oppo Reno17 charges faster — 80W wired against 10W.
Category scores
| Category | Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933 | Oppo Reno17 |
|---|---|---|
| Display | 4.8 | — |
| Software | 5.8Tie | 6.0Tie |
| Performance | — | 8.0 |
| Camera | — | 5.7 |
| Battery | — | 9.2 |
| Call Quality | — | 7.8 |
Open the interactive comparisonRadar chart, winner highlights and a differences-only view.
Reasons to consider
Oppo Reno17
- Faster charging (80W vs 10W)
- More storage (512 GB vs 128 GB)
Full specifications side by side
| Specification | Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933 | Oppo Reno17 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | ||
| Launch status | Available | Rumored |
| Release date | 2019 | — |
| Expected release window | — | Nov 2026 |
| Platform | ||
| OS | Android | Android |
| OS version | Google Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 17, ColorOS 17 |
| Chipset (as published) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 (Trinket), 2019, 64 bit, octa-core, 11 nm, Qualcomm Adreno 610 GPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 |
| CPU | 2000.0 MHz | — |
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | — |
| Memory | ||
| Memory variants (RAM/storage) | 128 GB | 12 GB RAM + 128 GB · 12 GB RAM + 256 GB · 12 GB RAM + 512 GB |
| Display | ||
| Display size | 165.1″ | — |
| Resolution | 720 × 1,600 pixels | — |
| Panel type | IPS LCD | — |
| Display protection | Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Battery | ||
| Wired charging | 10W | 80W |
| Battery capacity | — | 7,000 mAh |
| Body & build | ||
| Weight | 195 g | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5 | — |
| USB | USB C reversible; USB charging , USB Host , USB OTG 1.3 , USB PD | — |
| Camera | ||
| Front cameras | 8 MP | — |
| Rear cameras | — | 50 MP · 50 MP · 50 MP · 50 MP |
| Network | ||
| Network technologies | — | 5G |
Popular comparisons for Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933
- Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933 vs Philips S7210Better for Display
- Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933 vs Philips S7221Better for Display
- Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProBetter for Display
- Oppo A5 2020 Premium Edition Global Dual SIM TD-LTE V3 128GB CPH1933 vs Samsung Galaxy A58
Popular comparisons for Oppo Reno17
- Oppo Reno17 vs Philips S7210Overall scoreOppo Reno177.3Philips S72105.9
- Oppo Reno17 vs Philips S7221Overall scoreOppo Reno177.3Philips S72215.7
- Oppo Reno17 vs RugOne Xsnap 7 ProOverall scoreOppo Reno177.3RugOne Xsnap 7 Pro6.9
- Oppo Reno17 vs Samsung Galaxy A58Better for Cameras